A Text-book of Entomology: Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Embryology and Metamorphoses of Insects for Use in Agricultural and Technical Schools and Colleges as Well as by the Working EntomologistPackard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Science
A Text-book of Entomology: Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Embryology and Metamorphoses of Insects for Use in Agricultural and Technical Schools and Colleges as Well as by the Working Entomologist
Packard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Insects
=Mode of vision by single eyes or ocelli.=—In their simplest condition,
the eyes of worms and other of the lower invertebrates, probably only
enable those animals to distinguish light from darkness. The ocelli of
spiders and of many insects, however, probably enable them, as Lubbock
remarks, to see as our eyes do. The simple lens throws on the retina an
image, which is perceived by the fine terminations of the optic nerve.
The ocelli of different arthropods differ, however, very much in degree
of complexity.
Müller considered that the power of vision of ocelli “is probably
confined to the perception of very near objects.”
“This may be inferred,” Müller states, “partly from their existing
principally in larvæ and apterous insects, and partly from several
observations which I have made relative to the position of these
simple eyes. In the genus Empusa the head is so prolonged over the
middle inferior eye that, in the locomotion of the animal, the
nearest objects can only come within the range. In _Locusta
cornuta_, also, the same eye lies beneath the prolongation of the
head.... In the Orthoptera generally, also, the simple eyes are, in
consequence of the depressed position of the head, directed
downwards towards the surface upon which the insects are
moving.”[46] Lowne considers that in the ocellus of Eristalis, the
great convexity of the lens must give it a very short focus, and the
comparatively small number of rods render the picture of even very
near objects quite imperfect and practically useless for purposes of
vision, and that the function of the ocelli is “the perception of
the intensity and the direction of light, rather than of vision, in
the ordinary acceptation of the term.”
Réaumur, Marcel de Serres, Dugès, and Forel have shown by
experiment, that in insects which possess both ocelli and compound
eyes, the former may be covered over without materially affecting
the movements of the animals, while if the facetted eyes are
covered, they act as if in the dark (Lubbock).
While Plateau regards the ocelli as of scarcely any use to the
insect, and Forel claims that wasps, humble bees, ants, etc., walk
or fly almost equally well without as with the aid of their ocelli,
Lubbock demurs to this view, and says the same experiments of
Forel’s might almost be quoted to prove the same with reference to
the compound eyes. Indeed, the writer has observed that in caves,
eyeless beetles apparently run about as freely and with as much
purpose, as their eyed relatives in the open air.
Plateau has recently shown that caterpillars which have ocelli alone
are very short-sighted, not seeing objects at a distance beyond one
or two centimetres, and it has been fully proved by Plateau and
others, that spiders, with their well-formed ocelli, are myopic, and
have little power of making out distinctly the shape of the objects
they see.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account