A Text-book of Entomology: Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Embryology and Metamorphoses of Insects for Use in Agricultural and Technical Schools and Colleges as Well as by the Working EntomologistPackard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Science
A Text-book of Entomology: Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Embryology and Metamorphoses of Insects for Use in Agricultural and Technical Schools and Colleges as Well as by the Working Entomologist
Packard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Insects
the organs of smell. While Robineau-Desvoidy, at the end of the
twentieth year, and also later, in different writings, strove
energetically for the olfactory nature of the antennæ,
Straus-Dürckheim held fast to the view that the tracheæ possessed
the function under discussion. At the same period Kirby and Spence,
in their valuable Introduction to Entomology, maintained that “two
white cushions on the under side of the upper lip” in the mouth of
biting insects formed a nose or “rhinarium” peculiar to insects.
This opinion was afterwards adopted by Lacordaire (Introduction à
Entomologie), and also by Oken in his Lehrbuch der Naturphilosophie,
while Burmeister, rejecting all the views previously held, believed
that insects might perhaps smell “with the inner upper surface of
the skin.” Müller’s locust’s ear he regarded as a vocal organ.
Besides these occasional expressions of opinion, the French
literature of the thirtieth and fortieth years of this century
recorded a long series of special works, with weighty experimental
and physiological contents, on this subject. Thus Lefebre, in 1838,
described the experiments which he made on bees, and which seemed to
assign the seat of the sense of smell to the antennæ. Dugès reported
similar researches on the Scolopendræ, and Pierret thought that the
great development of the antennæ in the male Bombycidæ might be
similarly interpreted. Driesch sought to give currency to the views
of Bonsdorf, Lamarck, and Marcel de Serres, that the sense of smell
was localized in the palpi, though Duponchel went back to the old
assertion of æroscepsis of Lehrman, _i.e._ of the air-test through
the antennæ, and Goureau again referred the seat of the sense of
smell to the mouth. In England, Newport at this period put forth a
work in which he considered the antennæ as organs of touch and
hearing, and the palpi as organs of smell—a view which, as regards
the antennæ, was opposed by Newman.
Thus the contention as to the use of the antennæ and the seat of the
organs of smell and hearing fluctuated from one side to the other,
and when in 1844 Küster, by reason of his experiments on numerous
insects, again claimed that “the antennæ are the smelling organs of
insects,” he argued on a scientific basis; yet v. Siebold and
Stannius (1848), in their valuable Lehrbuch der vergleichenden
Anatomie (p. 581), remarked that “organs of smell have not yet with
certainty been discovered in these animals.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account