A Text-book of Entomology: Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Embryology and Metamorphoses of Insects for Use in Agricultural and Technical Schools and Colleges as Well as by the Working EntomologistPackard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Science
A Text-book of Entomology: Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Embryology and Metamorphoses of Insects for Use in Agricultural and Technical Schools and Colleges as Well as by the Working Entomologist
Packard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Insects
“Bees have the power, by driving blood into the tongue, of forcing
the rod out from the sheath, and distending the wrinkled membrane so
that in section it appears as at _H_, Fig. 86, the membrane assuming
the form of a pouch, given in full length at _A_. It will be seen at
once that this disposition of parts abolishes the side ducts, but
brings the central duct to the external surface. The object of this
curious capability on the part of the bee is, in my opinion, to
permit of cleaning away any pollen grains, or other impediment that
may collect in the side ducts. The membrane is greasy in nature, and
substances or fluids can be removed from it as easily as water from
polished metal. If, now, the sides of a needle, previously dipped
into clove oil in which rosanilin (magenta) has been dissolved, so
as to stain it strongly red, be touched on the centre of the rod,
the oil immediately enters, and passes rapidly upwards and
downwards, filling the trough.”
=Does the hypopharynx represent a distinct segment?=—The facts which
suggest that the hypopharynx may possibly represent a highly
modified pair of appendages, arising from a distinct intermaxillary
segment, are these: Heymons plainly shows that, in the embryo of
Lepisma, the hypopharynx originates as a transverse segment-like
fold in front of the 2d maxillary segment, and larger than it, and
though he does not mention it in his text, it appears like the
rudiment of a distinct segment; the hypopharynx of Ephemeridæ;
arises and remains separate in the nymph from the labium (see
Heymons’ Fig. 29, and there are two lateral projections; see also
Fig. 72, and Vayssiere’s view that it may represent a pair of
appendages; Kolbe also regards it as representing a third pair of
maxillæ, his endolabium, p. 213). Though what is called an unpaired
organ, it is composed of, or supported by, two bilaterally
symmetrical styles, both in Myriopods (Fig. 6, labiella, _stil_) and
in insects (Fig. 77, etc.). On the other hand, in the embryo of
pterygote insects, an intermaxillary segment has not been yet
detected.
LITERATURE OF THE MOUTH-PARTS OR BUCCAL APPENDAGES
_a._ General
=Savigny, Jules-César.= Mémoires sur les animaux sans vertèbres.
1^{re} Part. Description et classification des animaux invertébrés
et articulés, etc. Fasc. 1^{re}. Mém. 1–2. Théorie des organes de la
bouche des crustacés et des insectes. 12 Pl., Paris, 1816, pp.
1–117.
=Gerstfeld, Georg.= Ueber die Mundteile der saugenden Insekten.
Dorpat, 1853.
=Olfers, Ernestus V.= Annotationes ad anatomiam Podurarum. Berolini,
1862, 4 Pls.
=Gerstaecker, Carl Eduard Adolph.= Zur Morphologie der Orthoptera
amphibiotica. (Festschrift zur Feier des hundertjährigen Bestehens
der Gesellschaft naturf. Freunde zu Berlin. 4º, 1873, pp. 39–59, 1
Taf.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account