A Text-book of Entomology: Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Embryology and Metamorphoses of Insects for Use in Agricultural and Technical Schools and Colleges as Well as by the Working EntomologistPackard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Science
A Text-book of Entomology: Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Embryology and Metamorphoses of Insects for Use in Agricultural and Technical Schools and Colleges as Well as by the Working Entomologist
Packard, A. S. (Alpheus Spring)
Insects
Ryder states that the evidence that the absence of fore tarsi in
Ateuchus is due to the inheritance of their loss by mutilation is
uncertain. Dr. Horn suggests that cases like Ateuchus and
Deltochilum, etc., “might be used as an evidence of the persistence
of a character gradually acquired through repeated mutilation, that
is, a loss of the tarsus by the digging which these insects
perform.” On the other hand, the numerous species of Phanæus do
quite as much digging, and the anterior tarsi of the male only are
wanting. “It is true,” he adds, “that many females are seen which
have lost their anterior tarsi by digging; have, in fact, worn them
off; but in recently developed specimens the front tarsi are always
absent in the males and present in the females. If repeated
mutilation has resulted in the entire disappearance of the tarsi in
one fossorial insect, it is reasonable to infer that the same
results should follow in a related insect in both sexes, if at all,
and not in the male only. It is evident that some other cause than
inherited mutilation must be sought for to explain the loss of the
tarsi in these insects.” (Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., Philadelphia,
1889, pp. 529, 542.)
[Illustration:
FIG. 111.—Fore tibia of _Phanæus carnifex_, ♂, showing no trace of the
tarsus.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 112.—Fore leg of the mole-cricket: _A_, outer, _B_, inner,
aspect; _e_, ear-slit.—After Sharp.
]
The loss of tarsi may be due to disuse rather than to the inheritance of
mutilations. Judging by the enlarged fore tibiæ, which seem admirably
adapted for digging, it would appear as if tarsi, even more or less
reduced, would be in the way, and thus would be useless to the beetles
in digging. Careful observations on the habits of these beetles might
throw light on this point. It may be added that the fore tarsi in the
more fossorial Carabidæ, such as Clivina and Scarites, as well as those
of the larva of Cicada and those of the mole crickets (Fig. 112), are
more or less reduced; there is a hypertrophy of the tibiæ and their
spines. The shape of the tibia in these insects, which are flattened
with several broad triangular spines, bears a strong resemblance to the
nails or claws of the fossorial limbs of those mammals which dig in hard
soil, such as the armadillo, manis, aardvark, and Echidna. The principle
of modification by disuse is well illustrated in the following cases.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account