A Text-Book of Horseshoeing, for Horseshoers and VeterinariansLungwitz, A. (Anton)
Science
A Text-Book of Horseshoeing, for Horseshoers and Veterinarians
Lungwitz, A. (Anton)
Horseshoeing
Peculiarities of the Shoe.
They are dependent upon the structure, direction, and position of the
leg and hoof, as well as upon the horse’s service and the nature of the
ground. Since the shoe is an artificial base of support, and since a
proper surface of support is of the greatest importance in preserving
the soundness of the feet and legs, careful attention must be given to
this matter. Naturally shoes designed for the various forms of hoofs
must present equally great and equally numerous differences of form, as
well as other peculiarities.
=General Properties.= 1. =Form.=—A form corresponding to the shape of
the hoof is indispensable in every shoe. Front and hind and right and
left shoes should be sharply defined and easily distinguishable. _Front
shoes_ must, above all else, be circular _round cut the toe_. _Hind
shoes_, on the contrary, should be _round pointed at the toe_, yet not
too much so, but as in Fig. 116.
2. =Width.=—All shoes should be wider webbed (more covered) at the toe
than at the ends of the branches. The medium width should be about
twice the thickness of the wall.
[Illustration: FIG. 107. Right front shoe, ground-surface.]
[Illustration: FIG. 108. Right front shoe, hoof-surface: _a_,
bearing-surface; _b_, concaving, or “seating.”]
3. =Thickness.=—Each shoe should, in general terms, be so thick that
it need not be renewed under four weeks. Lungwitz found that the
average required thickness is about seven-sixteenths of an inch. Of
course, this thickness must be diminished or increased according to the
rapidity of wear of the shoe. _Shoes without calks should be of uniform
thickness_, unless there are special reasons for making them otherwise.
4. =Length.=—For draft-horses they should be long enough to reach the
bulbs of the heel, otherwise shorter, though in other respects they may
differ (see “special properties”), but should in all cases completely
cover the bearing-surface of the hoof.
5. =Surfaces.=—That part of the hoof-surface of the shoe which is in
contact with the hoof (bearing-surface of the shoe, Fig. 109, _a_)
should be horizontal and wide enough to cover the wall, the white line,
and from a twelfth to an eighth of an inch of the outer edge of the
sole. Shoes for large hoofs require a broader bearing-surface than
those for small hoofs. The concaving, or “seating” (Fig. 109, _b_),
should be made deeper or shallower, according to the nature of the
sole. _Shoes for hoofs with strongly arched_ (very concave) _soles, do
not require any concaving_ (hind hoofs, narrow fore-hoofs). _The object
of concaving is to prevent pressure of the shoe upon the horny sole
except at its margin._
[Illustration: FIG. 109. Transverse section of a branch of a front
shoe: _a_, bearing-surface; _b_, concaving; _c_, fullering, or
“crease”; _d_, nail-hole.]
The ground-surface of the shoe should be flat and _perfectly
horizontal_, except at the toe, which may be turned upward (rolled toe,
“rolling motion”).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account