A text-book on hygiene and pediatrics from a chiropractic standpointCraven, J. H. (John Henry)
Science
A text-book on hygiene and pediatrics from a chiropractic standpoint
Craven, J. H. (John Henry)
Children -- Diseases; Chiropractic; Sanitation
It is not the purpose of chiropractic hygiene to say what a person
should or should not eat. Innate Intelligence is the best judge as to
that. Chiropractic philosophy teaches that a person may eat anything
that does not disagree with him; or to put it otherwise, a person
should eat what agrees with him. It also teaches us that pain and
discomfort from eating that which does not digest is Innate telling
the educated mind that this particular article is not being digested
and that he should not eat it. This lack of digestion is not the
fault of the food, but is due to an interference with transmission
which prevents Innate from bringing about an adaptation to this food.
In other words, the interference with transmission prevents Innate
from producing the secretion that is needed in the digestion of this
particular article or diet.
Distinction between Appetite and Hunger
It is quite necessary that we make a distinction between appetite
and hunger. Hunger is Innate calling for food. It is the expression
through the educated brain of the vibratory interpretations which
are received from the tissue cells that are in need of nutrition.
These vibrations are interpreted by Innate Intelligence and Innate
becomes aware of the need of the tissue cell. Thereupon she expresses
this interpretation through the educated brain and we become aware,
educationally, of this condition which is interpreted as hunger.
Hunger is an Innate interpretation while appetite is an educated
interpretation. Hunger is a desire for food while appetite is a
desire for a certain kind of food. The appetite decides what kind of
food we will eat to satisfy the hunger. Appetite may be perverted.
When there is a condition which interferes with the process of
digestion Innate Intelligence takes away the desire for food. When
this is true there should be no effort on the part of the educated
man to tempt the appetite. If the appetite is tempted in such a case,
the food will not be properly digested, or if it is, it will be
necessary for Innate to employ force that should be used for some
other purpose.
If the processes of digestion are normal the individual may eat
any article of food and it will be properly digested and he will
not be conscious of this process. But if the process of digestion
is abnormal he may not be able to digest even the most scientific
diet. The severity of the indigestion will depend upon the degree of
interference with function. In such event appetite is not reliable
because it may call for something that can not be digested. Innate
knows nothing of the different foods. She calls for nutrition, but
the educated mind says beefsteak and eggs. Now if we become sick
after eating beefsteak and eggs this is Innate trying to let us know
that the food is not being digested and should not be taken into the
stomach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account