That the division of the property, mentioned in the text, did not long survive the time of Glanville, is most probable. (See Somner on Gavelk. p. 98.) Swinburne seems strangely to have blundered in thinking, that our author took part of his text from Magna Carta, (Swinburne on Wills, part 3. section 16.) The passing of which was an event clearly _posterior_ in time to Glanville.] CHAP. VI. The Testament ought to be made in the presence of two or more lawful Men, either clergy or lay, and such as can be proper witnesses of it. The Executors of a Testament should be such persons, as the Testator has chosen for that purpose, and to whom he has committed the charge. But, if he should not nominate any person for this purpose, the nearest of Kin and Relatives of the deceased may take upon them the charge; and this, so effectually, that should they find the Heir or any other person detaining the Effects of the deceased, they shall have the King’s Writ directed to the Sheriff in these words—— CHAP. VII. “The King to the Sheriff, Health.[243] I command you that, justly and without delay, you cause to stand the reasonable division of _N._ as it can be reasonably shewn that he made it, and that it ought to stand. Witness, &c.” [Footnote 243: Vide F.N.B. 270.] CHAP. VIII. When a party, summoned by authority of this Writ, alleges any thing against the Testament itself; either that it was not reasonably made, or that the thing claimed was not as asserted left by it, then, the Plea ought to be heard and determined in the Court Christian; because Pleas concerning Testaments ought to be agitated before the Ecclesiastical Judge, and decided according to the course of Law, on the Testimony of those who were present at the time of the making of the Will. But if the person, who intends to make a will, should be overburthened with Debts, he cannot (beyond the payment of his Debts) make any disposition of his Effects, without the consent of his Heir. Should it, however, happen, after payment of the Debts, that any thing remains, then it is divided into three parts in the manner before stated; and he may, as observed, make a Testament of a third part of it. If, however, the Effects of the deceased are insufficient to pay his Debts, then his Heir is bound to make up the deficiency out of his own; I mean, if he is of Age.[244] [Footnote 244: “If the goods of the defunct are not sufficient for payment of his Debts, by the Law, his Heir should pay the same of his own proper goods.” (Reg. Maj. L. 2. c. 39.) This Rule was soon altered. _Quatenus_, says Bracton, _ad ipsum pervenerit, scilicet, de hereditate defuncti et non ultra, nisi velit de gratia, et si nihil multo fortius._ (See Bracton 61. a. Fleta L. 2. c. 57. s. 10.) _Notandum est, quod nullus de antecessoris debito tenetur respondere ultra valorem quod de ejus hereditate dignoscitur possidere._ (Le Grand Cust. de Norm. c. 88.)] CHAP. IX.[245] [Footnote 245: Hereon generally, see Bracton 86. b.]