[Footnote 175: “The Feme, who is Demandant, may remove the same by a _Tolt_ into the County; and also may remove the same out of the County into the Common Pleas by a _Pone_, _&c._ without shewing any cause in the Writ, as the Demandant shall do in a Writ of Right Patent.” (F.N.B. 15.)] CHAP. VII. “The King to the Sheriff, Health. Put before me or my Justices, on such a day, the suit which is in your County Court, between _A._ and _N._ concerning one Hyde of Land in such a Vill, which the said _A._ claims against the aforesaid _N._ as her reasonable Dower. And Summon, by good Summoners, the aforesaid _N._ who holds that Land, that he be then there with his Plea. And have there,” &c. CHAP. VIII. Pleas of this description, as, indeed, some others, may be transferred from the County Court to the supreme Court of the King for a variety of Causes: as, on account of any doubt which may arise in the County Court concerning the plea itself, and which that court is unable to decide; (and when any suit is thus transferred to the Court, then both parties, as well the Tenant as the Demandant, shall be summoned.) But, when it has been removed upon the Petition of one of the parties, it will then suffice, if that party be summoned who did not require the removal: but, if the suit should be transferred to Court by the consent and prayer of both parties, being present in Court together, then, neither party ought to be summoned, because the day appointed in Court is known to both of them. Upon the day appointed in Court, either both parties will be absent, or only one will be so, or both will appear. We have already sufficiently treated concerning the absence of both, or of one only of the parties. If both be present in Court, the Woman shall set forth her claim against her Adversary in the following words. “I demand such Land, as appertaining to such Land, which was named to me in Dower, and of which my Husband endowed me at the door of the Church, the day he espoused me, as that of which he was invested and seised at the time when he endowed me.”[176] [Footnote 176: It is thus as literally set down in the Translation of the Regiam Majestatem.—“I claim sic Land, as are part and pertinents of that Land named by my umquhill Husband for my Dourie, quherewith he indowed me at the kirk dore, the samine day when he married me, wherein he was vest and saised at the time he indowed me therewith.” (L. 2. c. 16.)] Various are the Answers which the Adverse party usually gives to a claim of this kind; in substance, however, he will either deny that she was so endowed, or concede it. But, whatever he may allege, the Suit ought not to proceed, without the Heir of the Woman’s Husband. He shall, therefore, be summoned to appear in Court to hear the Suit, by the following Writ:—— CHAP. IX.