When a number of cases are thus brought together and placed in juxta
position it is impossible not to perceive, and indeed not to be forcibly
struck with the uniformity with which a certain series of changes takes
place. We do not see the same number of morbid appearances in every
case, but we see in every case precisely the same morbid changes as far
as they go, the difference being merely a difference in degree; so that
the description of such a number of cases as has now been detailed would
be tedious on account of its sameness, were it not that the fact they
establish is one which it is of paramount importance to the practitioner
that he should know; and that there appears to be no other means by
which it can be duly impressed upon the mind.
In like manner the uniformity of the symptoms which denote that these
morbid changes are going on, is as remarkable as the regularity with
which the changes themselves occur. Their great peculiarity, which it is
as important to know as it is to understand their indication itself, is
_their want of prominence_. They are always to be discerned, or with
extremely rare exceptions; but they seldom or never force themselves
upon the notice of the careless or extort the attention of the
unobserving: still they are not the less constant in their occurrence
because they come without noise, nor is the indication they give of
their presence less significant because it is unobtrusive. They do not
announce their presence by the excitement of violent paroxysms or by
inducing intense pain, because the state of the system in which they
take place is incompatible with acute sensation of any kind. The
prominent symptoms during life are almost always in the head; the great
changes of structure found after death are always in the intestines; and
this, which the pathologist learns from observation, the physiologist
might have predicted from his knowledge of function. The affection of
the intestines in fever is never a simple or single affection: it never
occurs alone, but always in combination with an affection of the brain;
and the cerebral affection is always antecedent, the intestinal,
invariably subsequent; while the certain consequence of the cerebral
affection is a diminution, and ultimately an abolition of sensation. It
is therefore quite impossible, from the very nature of the derangement
that takes place in the animal economy, that the intestinal affection
should ever be attended with violent pain. Occasionally, indeed, when
the abdominal affection is very much in excess, and the cerebral
affection is unusually slight, severe pain may be felt; but that is
rare, and the total absence of pain, and even the total absence of
tenderness on pressure, is more common. It is not then to the patient’s
own complaint of pain in the abdomen that the practitioner must trust
for the discovery of abdominal affection in fever.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account