Moreover, we have no example of instantaneous death by the sudden
excitement of inflammation in any organ, or in any number of organs:
inflammation is a process: a certain number of events take place in a
certain order; and there is always, as far as has been hitherto
observed, some interval between these events. A case is recorded in
which inflammation of the bowels (acute enteritis) proved fatal, as was
supposed, in eight hours from the commencement of the attack; but so
rapid was the process, that the intelligent surgeons who witnessed it
doubted whether the time when the disease began could have been noted
accurately: at all events, it does not accord with the best-established
facts relative to the process of inflammation, that it should prove
fatal without the lapse of some hours. Fever, on the contrary, does not
need as much as a single hour to complete the work of death. It is well
known that the poison which, in a certain state of concentration,
produces fever with the ordinary period of duration, in a higher state
of concentration produces instantaneous death; and that, in certain
climates and seasons, it is not uncommon for persons previously in sound
and vigorous health, on exposure to that poison, to sicken and to die in
a shorter space of time than is requisite, under ordinary circumstances,
for the mere formation of the inflammatory process. The state of the
system, in the primary attack of fever, and the state of the system in
inflammation, do not, therefore, appear to be identical. The truth is,
that we do not know what the real state of the system is in either case,
but we see that the phenomena of the one differ from those of the other;
to conclude, therefore, that the states are the same is not a sound
induction. While, then, we are constrained to admit that we know nothing
of the nature of the primary affection of the nervous system in fever,
the closest consideration of all the phenomena alike constrains us to
conclude, that that affection is peculiar and specific.
This peculiar and specific affection appears to be much more analogous
to the condition into which the nervous system is brought by the
application of certain poisons, than to that which is proper to pure
inflammation. The more closely and extensively the subject is
investigated, the more clear and satisfactory the evidence becomes, that
the great primary cause of fever is a poison, the operation of which,
like that of some other poisons, the nature of which is better
understood, and the action of which has been more completely examined,
is ascertained to be upon the nervous system. How these poisons act upon
the nervous system we do not know, nor can we possibly know, as long as
we remain so profoundly ignorant of the nature of the action of the
nervous system in the state of health.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account