The energy of the prime mover is seldom if ever regular. The force of
water varies with the copiousness of the stream. The power which impels
the windmill is proverbially capricious. The pressure of steam varies
with the intensity of the furnace. Animal power, the result of will,
temper, and health is difficult of control. Human labour is most of
all unmanageable; hence no machine works so irregularly as one which
is manipulated. In some cases the moving force is subject, by the very
conditions of its existence, to constant variation, as in the example
of a spring, which gradually loses its energy as it recoils. (255.) In
many instances the prime mover is liable to regular intermission, and
is actually suspended for certain intervals of time. This is the case
in the single acting steam-engine, where the pressure of the steam
urges the descent of the piston, but is suspended during its ascent.
The load or resistance to which the machine is applied is not less
fluctuating. In mills there are a multiplicity of parts which are
severally liable to be occasionally disengaged, and to have their
operation suspended. In large factories for spinning, weaving,
printing, &c. a great number of separate spinning machines, looms,
presses, or other engines, are usually worked by one common mover, such
as a water-wheel or steam-engine. In these cases the number of machines
employed from time to time necessarily varies with the fluctuating
demand for the articles produced, and from other causes. Under such
circumstances the velocity with which every part of the machinery is
moved would suffer corresponding changes, increasing its rapidity with
every augmentation of the moving power or diminution of the resistance,
or being retarded in its speed by the contrary circumstances.
But even when the prime mover and the resistance are both regular, or
rendered so by proper contrivances, still it will rarely happen that
the machine by which the energy of the one is transmitted to the other
conveys this with unimpaired effect in all the phases of its operation.
To give a general notion of this cause of inequality to those who have
not been familiar with machinery would not be easy, without having
recourse to an example. For the present we shall merely state, that the
several moving parts of every machine assume in succession a variety of
positions; that at regular periods they return to their first position,
and again undergo the same succession of changes. In the different
positions through which they are carried in every period of motion,
the efficacy of the machine to transmit the power to the resistance
is different, and thus the effective energy of the machine in acting
upon the resistance would be subject to continual fluctuation. This
will be more clearly understood when we come to explain the methods of
counteracting the defect or equalising the action of the power upon the
resistance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account