A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
ANOTHER gentleman-midwife delivered a woman of a fine child, or rather
received it, for it came naturally and easily. Upon which, he took it
into his head that he would not deliver her of the after-birth,
proposing to defer this work till next day. And so he would have done,
if he had not casually met with a less senseless practitioner, who
represented to him the danger to which, by so doing, he exposed the poor
patient he had left, and advised him to go back as fast as he could to
deliver her.[31]
I HAVE myself been not a little surprized at hearing lately some ladies
mention, with much approbation, the inimitable complaisance of certain
gentlemen-midwives, who have the patience, as they call it, to wait
five, six, seven hours by the clock, before they deliver of the
after-birth after the issue of the child, and that out of tenderness to
the patients, who, as they say, would be sadly off, if they fell into
hands more quick and expeditious.
BUT while I am thus taking notice of the errors of practice in the
men-practitioners, it may be objected to me, that I deal unfairly with
my reader.
FIRST, In not furnishing instances of male-practice of the midwives.
SECONDLY, That whereas I have confessed the incapacity of some of the
midwives, without allowing inferences from them against all the
professors of the art who are of the female sex, I ought to make the
same equitable allowance as to the men-practitioners, and not condemn
all for the sake of those insufficient ones, which the capable ones
themselves candidly condemn, witness among others, M. De la Motte.
NOW, as to my omitting such a specification of instances of mispractice
in my own sex, it is neither from partiality, nor affectation, that this
omission of mine proceeds. For could any one be so weak as retaliatively
to state cases, in the manner I have done, of mispractice of some
midwives; nothing could be more superfluous, nor less to the purpose. My
confession, my lamentation, that there are but too many ignorant
midwives, palpably obviate the necessity of proving what is granted. The
public would be very little the better for a truth, with which it cannot
but be too well acquainted, that there are ignorant midwives, and
insufficient men-practitioners. The truth then, for which I contend, is,
that the faults of the midwives, however it may be wished that they
could be prevented, are, comparatively speaking, neither so likely to
exist in Nature, nor of that horrid, atrocious kind, that are to be
found in the practice of the men-practitioners or instrumentarians.
There is nothing among the midwives of the puncturing, tearing with cold
pinchers, maiming, mangling, pulling limb from limb, disabling, as must
be inseparable in a greater or less degree from the use of those iron
and steel-instruments, which are so often and so unnecessarily employed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account