A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
WE shall now see what followed. Mr. De la Motte, that despiser of
midwives; Mr. De la Motte, who so consistently regretted his not being
admitted to the Hôtel Dieu at Paris, and accuses the women, educated at
that Hospital, of vanity, for valuing themselves on that education,
behaved himself on this occasion, as indeed his merit was that on most
occasions he did so, like a true good midwife: he found things _far
advanced_ enough, for him to leave the rest very wisely to Nature, and
so he did. The consequence of which was, that the patient was soon
delivered of a fine boy, and both mother and child did well.
SUCH was the result of Mr. De la Motte’s true midwifely proceeding. But
what would an instrumentarian have probably done? One of those, I say,
who, as to all the boasted improvement of the obstetrical art, produce
the stupendous inventions of those surely rather weapons of death, than
of life, which Dr. Smellie calls his REINFORCEMENTS, and is so good as
“_principally_” to recommend, “_namely the small forceps, blunt hook,
scissors, and curve crotchets_”, the unenviable privilege of using which
blessed substitutes to the soft fingers of women, being supposed
inherent to the men by right of superiority of skill, has so greatly
IMPROVED the art of midwifery, and thinned the number of good midwives,
by exploding their so much less painful, and certainly more safe method
of practice, both for mother and child? For after all, what can such
instruments be expected to do, but, instead of improving the art, to
multiply murders? if this should appear too severe, hear what Mr. De la
Motte himself says to the very case in point: to this very case, in
which himself, I repeat it, did no more than play the part of the good
midwife, and was only the more commendable for doing so.
“IF the operator of the place had been called, he would DOUBTLESS have
proceeded in this delivery, as he had done in the other (see p. 292.)
that is to say, he would have _quickly_ dispatched it with his
_crotchet_: but on the contrary, if he had had any experience, he would
have conducted the other delivery as I did this, and thereby have
exempted himself from the reproach he must have made to himself, for
having killed a poor woman in the most _cruel_ manner.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account