A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
BUT would a woman especially, who loves herself, who loves the child in
her womb, and who is capable of thinking at all, sacrifice herself and
child to so palpable an imposition, as that of the pretended superiority
of the men to the women in this point? She cannot even, well, without
repugnance, submit, nor but for the indispensable necessity probably
would submit to receive such service even from one of her own sex, whose
tender, soothing, congenial softness, must make it more easy and
supportable. But what can she expect from a man’s clumsy, aukward,
unnatural, disgustful operation, but increase of danger, or of pain,
perhaps of both; while she and her child may not improbably be the
victims of the rudiments in the art of a man by Nature condemned for
ever to be a novice only, and who, for possibly a great hire to assist
her, earns it only, as I have before observed, by excluding that due
relief he is himself not capable of giving her; earns it by the not
preventing enough her pains, and even by increasing her torments; till
at length, not unfrequently, some infernal instrument is produced, like
the dagger, in the fifth act of a tragedy, and forms the catastrophe of
mother, or of child, or of both?
Of the EXTRACTION of the head of the FŒTUS, severed from the BODY, and
which shall have remained in the UTERUS.
I AGREE with our modern writers, that there can hardly exist a more
vexatious accident, than that of the head’s remaining in the uterus,
after the extraction of the body. There are many causes of this effect.
The death of the child for some time past, so that the waters may have
had time to relax, to macerate the fibres, and thereby to render them
incapable of resisting any efforts; there will result from thence a
great difficulty of procuring the total issue of the dead fœtus, without
dismembering it.
SOME mis-conformation of parts in the mother may also contribute to it,
or the obliquity of the uterus, where the child is brought away by the
feet.
INDEPENDENTLY of all these causes, this accident is almost always the
effect of unskilfulness; it is, in truth, so rare, that it will scarce
ever happen, where the delivery is conducted by an accurate and able
practitioner of the art. If we have some examples, that even under
skilful hands this case has come into existence, a thorough examination
of it would shew, that it was only owing to the cruel necessity the
practitioner may have been under, of being aided by persons not duly
qualified to afford the least effectual help, or to conceive what they
were directed to do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account