A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
the head of the child, remaining too long in the passage, the child
cannot then be kept alive by means of the mother’s blood, whose motion
is stopped in that chord, as well by its cooling which coagulates it, as
by the compression which hinders it from circulating, for want of which
it is a necessity for the child to breathe, which he cannot do till his
head shall be intirely out of the uterus: therefore when once you have
begun the extraction of the child, you must try to procure the total
issue of it as quick as possible.”
MONSIEUR Levret, who has wrote for no end on earth but to recommend his
_tire-tête_, seizes the occasion of the foregoing passage extracted from
Mauriceau to tell us, page 51, of the first part of his work.
“MAURICEAU acknowledges here, that there are children who have the head
so large, as for it to remain stopped in the passage, after the body
shall have been wholly got out, notwithstanding all the precautions that
can be taken to avoid it.”
FROM whence this zealous instrumentarian draws the following conclusion.
“Here (says he) is one of those cases, in which my _instrument_ may be
of great service.”
THIS conclusion however does not to me at all appear a just one.
FIRST, because Mauriceau, after those lines of his, just above quoted by
Levret, adds immediately the method of practice pursuable in this case,
to give a good account of it without the help of instruments.
SECONDLY, because we are not at all to be concluded by what any author
says, any farther than the truth of things bears him out. Mauriceau[35]
might have explained himself better: he might have said, that, in this
case, the child should be pushed back a little into the uterus, to have
the freer play for its being more easily disingaged: he might have
advised, as I have before observed, rather a safer method of proceeding
than what he has done. Mr. Levret himself allows this p. 56. Then, still
with a view to recommend his forceps, his _tire-tête_, as being
absolutely necessary, he continues thus (p. 58.)
“THOUGH every thing should apparently have been done that is above set
forth, still we are not always so happy as to accomplish the delivery.
It sometimes happens, that we cannot get the head of the child out of
the uterus. There are of this two examples in the treatise of M. De la
Motte, of which I do not think it here out of place to furnish an
extract.
“MR. De la Motte, in his 253d. Observation, (goes on M. Levret) relates,
that in a case in which he was obliged to turn the child, in order the
better to finish the delivery, he turned it very easily; that having
brought it out as far as to the thighs ... it being alive, he gave its
body a half turn, so as to put its face downwards which it had upwards,
and that then he continued drawing out the child as far as to the
shoulders and neck.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account