A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
THOSE who will give themselves the trouble to peruse the authors who
have preceded thus, will find, that their method differs very little
from that of la Motte and Mauriceau, which most assuredly kills the
child if it is not dead: and the ascertainment of the death of a child
stuck in the passage is so difficult, that the ablest practitioners
cannot answer for not being mistaken in it. The reader will please to
apply here what I set forth, p. 139, and following, to which I beg leave
to refer.
MAURICEAU, at length, imagined, that he had out-done all others, in his
invention of an instrument he calls a _tire-tête_. He specifies it in
his 26th observation. But it is as dangerous as the crotchets, since, in
order to use it, you must begin by opening the skull with an
incision-knife, or with a sort of steel spike, double-edged, which he
invented on purpose for the use of piercing the child’s scull at the
_fontanelle_, to admit a little round plate of steel of another
instrument.
MONSIEUR Soumain, and other celebrated practitioners, have acknowledged
the insufficiency of this instrument of Mauriceau; but were it good for
any thing, as to drawing out the head so stuck, it would for ever be
fatal to those poor unfortunates, since it could not fail of killing
them if they were still alive.
AFTER this we have the tire-tête of Mr. Fried, but it is as murderous as
that of Mauriceau, nor answers the intentions which its author had
proposed to himself. He has therefore himself had the candor to condemn
it, as may be seen p. 154. in a treatise of midwifery, published in
1746, by the care of Mr. Boëhmer, who has added two dissertations to the
treatise on this art by Dr. Manningham.
MR. Menard, in his preface, p. 24, gives the figure of an instrument, of
which the idea seems to have been taken from a twibill, with a ducks
beak. Mr. Menard has endeavoured at perfecting it, by having it made
angular, shortened, and grooved. He has given it a figure of dented
pinchers, with curve claws. He gives us also the figure of an instrument
pointed and edged, made like the head of a spear, which he uses for
opening the scull, and introducing the pinchers, by means of which he
draws the child out by the head, as he keeps pinching the bones of the
scull and teguments. By this it is easy to conceive, that this
instrument has no advantage over that of Mauriceau, and has all its
inconveniences.
MANY other modern practitioners advise the use of one or two crotchets,
be the child dead or alive, or of a tire-tête, made in form of strait
blades, with spoon-bills, to introduce them one after another into the
uterus; and after having placed them on each side of the child’s head,
and made them meet together, to try the extraction with them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account