A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
THENCE this consequence seems derivable, that to obviate these
difficulties and dangers, it would be requisite to have as many crooked
spoons as there are particular cases, as well as to take measure of the
heads that are stuck, which still would imply the introduction of the
hand, and, of course, the uselessness of instruments.
MR. Levret, in his notes, p. 377, makes us observe, that the branches of
the forceps of Bingius, which are solid, being considerably more crooked
than the windowed forceps, the expansion of their middle part must be
too wide not to risque, in the extraction, the _tearing_ the perinæum,
which it is no such _indifferent_ matter as not to be remarked.
THIS Janckius had, it seems, that bad habit of employing too _soon_ the
instrument of Bingius, which is extremely dangerous. This however, is
not seldom the case, when Monsieur l’Accoucheur is in a hurry.
BOËHMER, in a dissertation on this subject, thus expresses himself, as
to the instrument of Levret, and the forceps of Bingius.
“I shall only observe (says that learned physician) what Mr. Levret has
himself very justly remarked, that the application of the forceps is
dangerous, unless the head should have already descended low enough into
the pelvis for the orifice of the uterus to be effaced, and to make but
one and the same cavity with the vagina. This counsel is essential for
two reasons;
“FIRST, for fear of hurting the orifice of the uterus which might easily
happen without this precaution.
“SECONDLY, on account of the instrument itself, the blades of which
could not embrace more than a part, and not the whole of the head, which
remaining too high, they could not consequently compress it equally, nor
extract it. It is for the same reasons (continues he) that I rather
differ in opinion from the celebrated Janckius, who, as soon as the
waters are discharged, and he perceives that the head does not pass, has
instantly recourse to the instrument.... Some time (says he) should be
indulged to the action of Nature.... There is often more success
obtained by temporising, than by too early a recourse to instruments.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account