A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
IT is then to this general axiom strongly dictated by reason, and surely
in no case more obviously so, than where the exquisitely tender texture
of the uterus protests against committing its safety from the cruellest
injuries, to the necessarily blind random agency of an iron or steel
instrument, so palpably ungovernable in so remote, intricate, and
slippery a place by even the most skilful hand[40]; it is, I say, in
exception to this so salutary general precept, that Mr. Levret will have
it that there are exceptions, and in favor of what, do you think, not
surely of the poor woman who, is to be the subject, or rather the victim
of the experiment, but of——his most egregiously silly CURVE FORCEPS!
Yes; it is by way of trying practices with that same instrument, that
the patient is liable to be _spread out_, in that delicate attitude
which I have above, (p. 237) described from Levret, to the perusal of
whom, for a thorough conviction of the perfect insignificance of that
instrument, or indeed of any of that sort, I would recommend even the
most sanguine in favor of instruments, if they would but grant, to their
own reason, its just prerogative of a previous suspence of prejudice.
IN these cases, however, for the which being exceptions to that
excellent general rule, Levret contends; and, to do him justice,
contends so auckwardly, that he rather provokes pity than indignation,
at his endeavouring to establish even so pernicious an error; let the
reader consider within himself the part into which this forceps is to be
thus blindly thrust, at the risque of so many almost inevitable dangers.
And for what?——In those cases it is either possible or not possible to
introduce the fingers. Where they absolutely cannot be insinuated, the
introduction of those instruments is in all human probability big with
the worst of mischiefs, where neither hand nor fingers can controul the
effects of the iron or steel: which, consequently, endanger more than
they can help, and are therefore not to be used. But if the hand or the
fingers can be insinuated, the hand or the fingers well conducted will
do the work without the help of instruments, which in this second
supposition become also useless.
THIS brings me to this case particularly, the title of which is prefixed
to this section, that of a head stuck in the passage, which the
gentlemen-midwives may perhaps second Levret, in maintaining to be an
exception to that admirable axiom above quoted, and maintain it purely,
in evasion of the conclusion against their miserable instruments, which
I aver need never be resorted to, nor never are, but for want of
sufficient skill in the manual function to terminate such labors without
them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account