A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
THIS is a fact that does not require the being believed upon my word.
The known practice at that hospital, and the registers regularly kept,
will attest the truth of this computation. And here, I appeal to every
intelligent reader’s own sense, to his own knowledge of things, whether
it is unfairly presumed, that in the same number of two thousand women,
delivered by the men-practitioners, they could show a roll so innocent,
so free from fatal mischief or damage to their patients, to mother and
to child. Let any parents, or who may hope to be parents, or are
concerned but for the interest of mankind in population, weigh but the
force of this argument, purely drawn from a matter of fact, of which
there can be so few who are not, in some measures, judges enough to
decide upon their own knowledge, or at least on strong grounds of belief
or conjecture. In such a number as two thousand women delivered by the
men-operators, how many, by what I know, and by what many others must
know as well as I, must have perished, or been torn, ruptured,
grievously hurt, or irreparably damaged! How many innocent infants must
have lost their little lives, in proof of that superiority of practice
in the men to the women! Or rather, in proof of that infatuate
credulity, which has prevailed in favour of an innovation so
unauthorized by nature, by common sense, or by experience!
OBJECTION the Thirteenth.
SAY what you will, the fashion will predominate. It is now the fashion
to prefer men-practitioners of midwifery to midwives. You will oppose
the torrent in vain.
ANSWER.
THE conclusion against me that I shall oppose the torrent in vain, is a
very just one. As to myself, I ought to expect that I should oppose it
in vain, if the decision of the public was to turn upon any thing of so
little authority as my private opinion, especially in a point where it
is so justly liable to the suspicion of its being byassed, both by
private interest, and partiality to my own sex. I readily then grant
that my own opinion should go for nothing. But what ought to go for a
great deal is my reader’s own judgment, formed upon his own reason and
knowledge. But that is not all. I have some dependence on Nature and
common sense recovering their rights, from this preference of the
men-midwives which shocks both, being, in truth, nothing more than a
fashion, not even of the growth of this country, but transplanted from a
neighbouring one, whose follies are unhappily so contagious, though for
the most part so despicable. How a few interested men, for want of
business in their own professions, transplanted this baneful exotic
here, where it has met with such undue cherishment has already been
touched upon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account