A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
BUT as to this profession of midwifery, even the total extinction of the
real midwives, would not be perhaps so bad as giving that name to those
poor creatures in training under the men-practitioners, who
independently of their own incapacity of practice, consequently of
forming good practitioners, have a palpable interest not to suffer their
women-pupils to gain any eminence in the profession that might give
umbrage to themselves[22]. The midwives whom these men-practitioners
would perhaps gratiously allow to subsist, might to their own
insufficiency add the dangerous circumstance of creating, or at least of
not preventing, by duly exerting themselves in the predisposing part,
the necessity of calling in their protectors, especially where
recommended by them. Not that I imagine even these mock-midwives would
wilfully be guilty of such prevarication in their duty. For them not to
deserve such a suspicion, it is enough that they are women, consequently
tender-hearted. But that does not exclude the idea of weakness. But
where so fair a virtue as gratitude may disguise even from themselves
the fouler motive of interest lurking at bottom, if that tenderness is
not even destroyed, it may not impossibly be made a tool of, and join in
persuading them, that things had really better be left to the
men-practitioners, whose creatures and devotees they are. Thence a
negligence superadded to their defect of skill. Such subalterns then
would, at least, not be dis-inclined to the “FINDING” _themselves_ “AT A
LOSS”, or yet worse for the patient, have by their omissions, if not
commissions, bred the occasion of “_finding_” themselves “_at that
loss_”, even mechanically, and without the direct design of paying their
court to their recommending “_accoucheur_, _their man of honor_ and
_real friend_,” in a _candid_ recourse to him. Pity it were indeed that
so charming a harmony should not subsist between _the accoucheurs_ and
such _midwives_, for the “MUTUAL ADVANTAGE” of both! A harmony, which
however could hardly be established but at the expence of the sacrificed
patients.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account