A Treatise on the Plague and Yellow Fever: With an Appendix, containing histories of the plague at Athens in the time of the Peloponnesian War; at Constantinople in the time of Justinian; at London in 1665; at Marseilles in 1720Tytler, James
History
A Treatise on the Plague and Yellow Fever: With an Appendix, containing histories of the plague at Athens in the time of the Peloponnesian War; at Constantinople in the time of Justinian; at London in 1665; at Marseilles in 1720
Tytler, James
Plague -- Early works to 1800; Yellow fever -- Early works to 1800
[91] That this is the case with the atmosphere at Martinico is now
determined by a letter from Dr. George Davidson to Dr. Mitchell of
New York, inserted in the Medical Repository, vol. ii, p. 279. With
equal parts of nitrous and atmospheric air there was an absorption of
67 parts out of 100; but when two parts of atmospheric air were used
to one of nitrous, the absorption was only from 52 to 58 parts; with
a mixture of iron filings and sulphur, upwards of four tenths of the
air were absorbed. These experiments were attested by a number of
medical gentlemen who were present. In a letter subjoined from Dr.
Chisholm, he says, that, having made a trial with iron filings and
sulphur, the absorption was forty parts of an hundred, or exactly
four tenths, with the eudiometer fifty-six. “It appears to me (says
Dr. Chisholm) to be a singular circumstance, that, although the
ground on which the Ordnance Hospital Hands is a perfect morass,
partially drained, yet a result almost exactly similar to that given
by the experiments made with the eudiometer at my house, should take
place, with the same instrument and in circumstances very different.
The proportion at the Ordnance Hospital, I think, has been 58 out of
100, and at your house, a situation less swampy, and nearer the sea,
it has been 67. An explanation of so singular a result, in situations
so different, is perhaps more to be wished than expected.”
From this discovery it appears, that, whatever may be the cause of
the frequency and violence of epidemics in warm climates, it _is not_
the want of oxygen. Nay, we should rather be tempted to think that
they were produced by too great an abundance of it; and this the
more especially when we know that animals confined in oxygen air are
supposed to die of a burning fever; and it is likewise known that this
kind of air is prejudicial to consumptive people, and even brings on
the disease on those who had it not before. From the experiments
mentioned in the note, it seems probable that there are but few even of
swampy places in hot climates, where oxygen does not predominate; and
in these the heat thrown into the blood must still be augmented by that
produced from the quantity of vapour decomposed or condensed in the
lungs, which, as the condensation depends upon unknown circumstances,
can never be foreseen, or ever prevented, but by a removal from the
place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account