A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
But Cardenas saw clearly that, to deal as he wished with the Jesuits,
he must entirely gain the Governor’s confidence. This he tried to do by
sending to him one Father Lopez, Provincial of the Dominicans. This
Lopez was an able and apparently quite honest man, for he told the
Governor that the wish of Cardenas was to expel the Jesuits from
Paraguay, and from their missions, warning him at the same time not to
allow himself to be made use of by the Bishop in his design. From that
moment the two adversaries seemed to have changed characters, and Don
Gregorio became as cautious as a churchman, whereas the Bishop seemed
to lose all his diplomacy.
To all the protestations of friendship which were addressed to him, the
Governor answered so adroitly that the Bishop fell into the trap, and
thought he had secured a partner to help him in the expulsion of the
Jesuits. Finally, at Yaguaron, during a sermon, he formulated his
celebrated charges against the Jesuits, which, set on foot by him in
1644, eventually caused the expulsion of the whole Order from America,
and, though refuted a thousand times, still linger in the writing of
all those who treat the question down to the present day. The charges
were seven in number, and so ingeniously contrived that royal,
national, and domestic indignation were all aroused by them. The first
was that the Jesuits prevented the Indians from paying[125] their
annual taxes to the crown. Secondly, that the Jesuits kept back the
tithes from Bishops and Archbishops.[126] Thirdly, he said the Jesuits
had rich mines in their possession, and that the product of these mines
was all sent out of the country to the general fund at Rome. This the
Jesuits disproved on several occasions, but, as often happens in such
cases, proof was of no avail against the folly of mankind, to whom it
seemed incredible that the Jesuits should bury themselves in deserts to
preach to savages, unless there was some countervailing advantage to be
gained. Even the fact that at the expulsion of the Company of Jesus
from America no treasure at all was found at any of their colleges or
missions did not dispel the conviction that they owned rich mines. The
fourth charge was that the Jesuits were not particular about the
secrets of the confessional, and that they used the information thus
acquired for their own selfish ends. Further, that Father Ruiz de
Montoya had acquired from the King, under a misapprehension, a royal
edict,[127] giving the territory of the missions to the Jesuits, thus
taking the fruits of their conquest from the Spanish colonists.
Fifthly, that the Jesuits entered Paraguay possessed but of the clothes
upon their backs, that they had made themselves into the sovereign
rulers of a great territory, but that he was going to expel them, as
the Venetians had expelled them from Venetia.[128] Sixthly, that even
the Portuguese of San Paulo de Piritinanga had expelled them.[129] His
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account