A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
The answer Cardenas received from Tucuman was most ironically couched
in the best style that his long-suffering friend was able to command.
After addressing Cardenas as ‘your illustrious lordship’, he proceeded
to demolish all his statements in such a manner as to argue that he had
had much practice with refractory priests in his own diocese. He told
him that the Jesuits were the only Order in Paraguay that really worked
amongst the Indians. He reminded him that from that Order the ‘second
Paul’, _i.e._, St. Francis Xavier, had himself issued. He asked him
whether, as a churchman, he thought the yearly sum of twelve thousand
crowns given by the King out of the treasury of Buenos Ayres towards
the Jesuits’ work was better saved, or that the thousands of Indians
whom the Jesuits had converted should be lost to God. And as to heresy,
he said he was no judge, leaving such matters to the Pope; but that no
one accused the Jesuits of corruption in their morals, or of any of the
greater crimes to which the great fragility of human nature renders us
liable. He reminded him the Jesuits had made no accusation on their
part, but always spoke of him with moderation and respect. And as to a
provincial council, he said that it was impossible, for the following
good cause: The Bishop of Misque[135] was too infirm to travel; the
Bishop of La Paz was lately dead, and the see still vacant; the Bishop
of Buenos Ayres only just arrived, and too much occupied to leave his
diocese. Therefore, the only Bishops available were himself and
Cardenas, and that they never would agree.
‘Moreover,’ he remarked, ‘what is it that your illustrious lordship
wishes me to do?
‘To advise a Bishop?
‘God has only given me the charge of my own sheep. Your lordship knows
as well as I do how a Bishop should comport himself.’
He finished with a quotation, saying that a Bishop’s state was not to
lie ‘in splendore vestium, sed morum; non ad iram, sed ut omnimodum
patientium.’
What Cardenas replied is not set down in any history which has come
under my observation, but what he must have thought is easy to divine.
The Governor of Paraguay, not content with having put his case before
the Supreme Court of Charcas, sent also to the Council General of the
Indies in Seville, detailing all the vagaries of the Bishop. The
Jesuits also empowered an officer to represent them there.
During these preparations, and whilst everyone was off his guard, the
Guaycurús endeavoured to surprise the capital, and would have done so
had not some regiments of Guaranís arrived in time from the mission
territory. This should have been an object-lesson to those who always
tried to show the Jesuits in the light of enemies to the authority of
the King of Spain. Nothing, however, proved of the least avail, and
though on several occasions the Spanish power in Paraguay was only
saved by the exertions of the Jesuits and their Indians, the calumnies
of Cardenas had taken too deep root to be dispelled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account