A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
All this relatively large population of Indians was ruled, as has been
seen, by a quite inconsiderable number of priests, who, not disposing
of any European force, and being almost always on bad terms with the
Spanish settlers in Paraguay on account of the firm stand they made
against the enslaving of the Indians, had no means of coercion at their
command. Hence the Indians must have been contented with their rule,
for if they had not been so the Jesuits possessed no power to stop them
from returning to their savage life. Azara,[213] although in the main
an opponent of the Jesuits, in the same way that a ‘good Liberal’ of
to-day would oppose anything of a Socialistic tendency, yet has this
most significant passage in their favour. After enumerating the amount
of taxes paid by the missions to the Crown, he says ‘en faisant le
bilan tout se trouvait égal, et s’il y avait quelque excédant, il était
en faveur des Jésuites ou des peoplades.’[214] Seldom enough does such
a result take place when the balance is struck to-day in any country
between the rulers and their ‘taxables’. Following their system of
perfect isolation from the world to its logical sequence, the Jesuits
surrounded all the territories of their different towns with walls and
ditches, and at the gates planted a guard to prevent egress or ingress
between the missions and the outer world.[215] Much capital has been
made out of this, as it is attempted to be shown that the Indians were
thereby treated as prisoners in their own territories. Nothing,
however, has been said of the fact that, if the ditches, palisades, and
guard-houses kept in the Indians, they also had the effect of keeping
the Spaniards out. When men who looked upon the Indians as without
reason, and captured them for slaves when it was possible, began to
talk of liberty, it looks as if the ‘sacred name of liberty’ was used
but as a stalking-horse—as greasy Testaments are used to swear upon in
police-courts, when the witness, with his tongue in his cheek, raises
his eyes to heaven, and then with fervency imprints a kiss upon his
thumb.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account