A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
In 1731 an order came from Madrid to execute him, and without loss of
time he was placed on a horse draped all in black, and, preceded by a
herald and guarded by a troop of guards, taken out to the public square
to be beheaded. But the good people of the capital, who, in the fashion
of the world, would not most probably have stirred a step to save a
saint, were mightily concerned to see a rogue receive his due deserts.
The streets were filled with thousands crying out ‘Pardon!’ stones
flew, and the affair looked so threatening that the Viceroy had to get
on horseback and ride amongst the crowd to calm the tumult. The people
met him with a shower of stones, and he, fearing the prisoner would
escape, called on his guards to fire upon him. Four balls pierced
Antequera, who fell dying from his horse into the arms of two
accompanying priests. Thus the most turbulent of all the Governors of
Paraguay ceased troubling, and the executioner, after having cut off
his head, exhibited it to the people from the scaffold, with the usual
moral aphorism as to the traitor’s fate.
The triumph of the Jesuits in Asuncion was but momentary, following the
general rule of triumphs, which take their way along the street with
trumpets and with drums amid the acclamations of the crowd, and then,
the pageant over, the chief actors fall back again into the struggles
and the commonplace of ordinary life.
Between the years 1728 and 1730 the people of Asuncion had been more
eager in pursuit of liberty[230] than was their usual wont. The
citizens were divided into camps, and daily fought amongst the sandy
streets and shady orange-bordered lanes which radiate from almost every
quarter of the town. The rival bands of madmen were styled respectively
the ‘Communeros’ and the ‘Contrabandos’, and to the first Antequera
throughout his residence in Lima gave all the assistance in his power.
Neither of the two seems to have had the most elementary idea of real
patriotism, or any wish for anything beyond the momentary triumph of
the miserable party to which each belonged. One doctrine they held in
common—a hatred of the Jesuits, and of the influence they exercised
against the enslaving of the Indians, which was the aim of
‘Contrabandos’ and of ‘Communeros’ alike. One of the rival chieftains
of the factions having fled for refuge to the missions, the people of
Asuncion assembled troops to take him from his sanctuary by force.
Arrived upon the frontier of the Jesuit territory, they found
themselves opposed by an army of the Indians, who looked so formidable
that the troops retired to Asuncion, and the leaders, foiled in the
field, and not having force to attack the Jesuits in their own
territory, set vigorously to inflame the minds of the people against
them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account