A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
Indians to leave their homes and march into the forests, and there
found new towns.
At that date François Retz was General of the Jesuits, and on him
devolved the duty of communicating the orders of the courts of Spain
and Portugal to the Jesuits in the missions of the Uruguay. Father
Bernard Neyderdorffer was the man on whom the Provincial of Paraguay
(Father Barreda) imposed the task of communicating to the Indians the
wishes of the two courts. Though he had lived already thirty-five years
in the missions, and knew the Indians well, and was respected by them
as a father, he seems at first to have shrunk from such a task. When
the news was brought to the towns upon the Uruguay, none of the Indians
at first would credit it. The _caciques_ (chiefs) of the seven towns
declared that they would rather die than leave their native place.
Nothing was heard but lamentations and expressions of hatred of the
Portuguese, mingled with denunciations of the Jesuits themselves, who
the poor Indians not unnaturally believed were in league with Spain to
sell them to the Portuguese. But in a little the clamours turned to
action, and, not content with refusing to obey the edict of the two
courts, the Indians broke into revolt. Two most important narratives of
this revolt exist, one by Father Cardiel and one by Father Ennis, both
of whom were witnesses of the events. After considerable negotiations,
which lasted till 1753,[259] the united troops of Portugal and Spain
advanced into the mission territory to arrange the occupation of the
ceded towns. The commissioners of the two nations were, for Spain, the
Marques de Valdelirios, and for Portugal General Gomez Freyre de
Andrade, and both of them appear to have come to America already
prejudiced against the Jesuits. On March 24, 1753, Andrade wrote to
Valdelirios, almost before he could have heard anything definite about
the mission territory, to which they both were strangers, telling him
that opposition was to be expected, and that the Jesuits were urging
the Indians to revolt.[260] The opposition that the two commissioners
so confidently hoped to find,[261] and which contemporary writers have
set forth in its true colours as but the revolt of ignorant Indians
rendered desperate by being arbitrarily dispossessed of lands which
they themselves had settled and held for almost a hundred years, was
fraught with serious consequences, not only to the Jesuits in Paraguay,
but to the Order throughout the world at large. For years their enemies
had said the Jesuits were endeavouring to set up in the missions a
State quite independent of the Spanish crown. By their own conduct the
Jesuits to some extent had given colour to the report, for by excluding
(in the interest of the Indians) all Spaniards from the mission
territories, it looked as if they were at work at something which they
wished to keep a secret, as no one at that time deemed it a serious
plea to enter into any line of conduct for the good of Indians, whom in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account