A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
mendacious chronicle leaves him on the throne, just after having joined
the empire of the Mamalucos to that of Paraguay, and promising to give
the world more of his history when it comes to hand.
By stories such as those contained in the mendacious little book
imprinted at St. Paul, the easy-minded public—then, as now, always more
easily impressed with lies than with the truth—was biassed against the
Jesuits in Paraguay. Father Dobrizhoffer,[295] who knew ‘King’ Nicolas
from his youth up, has left a very different version of his history, in
which no Donna della Cupidità or de la Victoria even remotely
flourishes. Nicolas Ñeenguiru was born in the township of La
Concepcion, of which in after-life he rose to be the mayor. He married
an Indian woman, not ‘une belle Andalouse’, and Dobrizhoffer says a
friend of his, one Father Zierheim, had him whipped publicly for petty
theft when a young man. At the time (1753) when, in company with
another Indian, one José, mayor of San Miguel, he headed the Indian
revolt, he was a man of middle age, tall, taciturn and grave, and not
ill-looking, though marked across the cheek with a disfiguring scar. At
no time was he even a lay brother of the Jesuit Order, as by their
rules in Paraguay no Indians were ever taken either as lay brothers or
as priests. So little was the man feared by the authorities that, once
the Indians’ resistance was over, Nicolas went to the Spanish camp, was
quietly heard, dismissed, and then continued in his office as the mayor
of his native place. The legend sprang from a mistake in Guaraní, to
which perhaps a little malice gave its artful charm. In Guaraní the
word ‘Rubicha’ signifies a chief, whereas ‘Nfurabicha’ means king. The
two, pronounced by one but ill acquainted with the language sound
identical. Nothing was more likely than that the Indians should call
their general their chief; had they thought really of settling upon a
king, it is certain that they would have chosen one of the family of
some well-known chief, and not an Indian merely appointed mayor by the
Jesuits. But be that as it may, General Ñeenguiru, though he has left
some interesting letters, which are preserved in the archives of
Simancas, showed no capacity for generalship.[296] Throughout the
course of the campaign he endeavoured to replace his want of skill by
tricks and by intrigues, but of so futile a nature that they were
frustrated and rendered useless at once. His first endeavour was to
gain time, when he found himself with seventeen hundred men opposed to
Andonaegui, Governor of Buenos Ayres, who had an army well equipped
with guns, of about two thousand men. Ñeenguiru wrote to Andonaegui,
telling him that the Indians were ready to submit, and then, whilst
waiting for an answer, set about fortifying the position which he held.
Warned by a spy, Andonaegui attacked at once, and drove the Indians
from their trenches like a flock of sheep, taking their wooden cannon,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account