A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
The Itatines, either suspecting that Acosta’s true law was false, or
tired of his preaching, rose and killed him; but the effect was bad,
and there grew up amongst those infidels a coldness even towards the
Jesuits themselves. Had it not been for two miraculous events which
happened opportunely, as such things should happen if they are to be
turned to good account, much harm might have been done. A chief, having
cursed a priest, was seized at once with a malignant ulcer in the
throat, which shortly killed him. The Itatines did not apparently think
anything of the influence of the unhealthy climate in which they lived,
and set the occurrence down to the act of God.
But more was still to come. Another chief having so far forgotten
himself as to jeer at a priest, a thunderbolt fell so close to him that
he was knocked senseless, and lay as dead. These two events confirmed
the Jesuits’ power, and things began to flourish in their four new
missions. But the Great Power, so careful of the individual effort of
His priests, seems to have been most unaccountably remiss of their
success considered as a whole. In the same year (1632) the Mamelucos
appeared and ruined all the four missions, so that the efforts of the
Jesuits and the miracles were lost.
In 1633 the first skirmish took place between the Bishop of Paraguay
and the Jesuits. This skirmish little by little grew into a war, kept
up for more than a hundred years, and ended finally in the expulsion of
the Jesuits from Paraguay. The Governor, Don Luis de Cespedes, having
called upon the Indians of the Jesuit missions for personal service, a
proceeding quite against both the King’s orders and the Papal Bulls,
the Bishop thought the moment opportune to press for tithes. This, too,
was equally forbidden both by a Bull and by an order of the Council of
the Indies. Padre Romero went to Asuncion and displayed his Bulls and
his orders of the Council, and the Governor withdrew his claims. The
Bishop, after some opposition, withdrew likewise, and the Provincial of
the Order arrived at Asuncion, bringing with him an order from the King
signifying that the Indians of the reductions were to be left entirely
to the Jesuits. So for the present the Jesuits scored a victory, though
in the future it was to cost them dear. But the Governor of Paraguay
having returned apparently to his design of exacting personal service
from the Indians of the missions, the Provincial checkmated him with a
royal order from Philip IV. The order was addressed to the Viceroy of
Peru, the fourth Count of Chinchon. The missive, dated at Madrid in
1633, condemned in the strongest terms all personal service (that is,
forced labour) amongst the Indians, not only of the Jesuit missions,
but of Peru and Mexico. With a touching confidence in his own powers,
and absolute right Divine, the well-meaning King added to his orders a
paragraph commanding all to be done as he had ordered within six
months.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account