A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815Cotton, Edward
History
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815
Cotton, Edward
Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
The Duke says, “Had they forced our position, instead of taking
advantage of it and pressing on they must have turned round to face
the Prussians, who were at that time in great force pressing the
enemy’s right and rear.”
Looking at the relative situations of Plancenoit, Mont-St.-Jean, and
the French army, reckless as Napoleon had doubtless then become, it
is still surprising he made the attack.
[60] _See_ the prince de la Moskowa’s letter to the duc d’Otrante,
Appendix, No. V, p. 253.
[61] “Up, guards, and at them!” or, “Up, guards, make ready!” what an
idea of mutual confidence between the general and his men, does that
simple order convey!
No haranguing, which, if it excites the soldiers, also expresses
a doubt of their exertions; nothing of that kind was considered
necessary, but a command, which, from its very simplicity, shows the
entire conviction, in the mind of him who gave it, that it would be
most effectually obeyed.
[62] A column or columns advancing to an attack, although steady
as on parade, on nearing the line of a cool determined enemy, must
be quickly shattered by the converging fire, which would drop
their leading and flank files, the only men that can really use
their muskets; confused by different words of command from various
officers, often enveloped in smoke and crowded together, the pressure
is such, that every movement augments disorder and confusion. The
imposing advance of large masses has often intimidated an enemy,
notwithstanding they are only really formidable in the imagination,
until deployed into line, during which evolution, a good volley,
resolutely followed up by the application of the cold steel, would
overthrow the best troops that ever pulled a trigger.
The Duke says, “Napoleon did not manœuvre at all; he just moved
forward in the old style, in columns, and was driven off in the old
style.” (_Letter to Lord Beresford_, July 2d, 1815, in the Appendix,
No. II, p. 218.)
I will not go so far as to say that moving forward in any other
formation would have gained them the battle, but I do think the old
style of advancing in columns did not give them a chance.
[63] From the circumstance of the columns of the Imperial guard
making their attack at the point of our line which ran curving
forward, they must have become, on crowning the allied position,
exposed to a cross-fire of all arms, which may be thus described:
Halkett’s left and Vandersmissen’s batteries formed the left of
the curve, whilst the immediate right of it consisted of Halkett’s
right, our guards and Napier’s battery, whose right was brought
rather forward; thus the fires were diagonal, that is, the two fires
evidently crossed.
It is therefore not astonishing that the veterans of a hundred fights
gave way under this, to use their own words, _effroyable_ (dreadful)
cross-fire upon both front and flank.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account