A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815Cotton, Edward
History
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815
Cotton, Edward
Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
M. de Vaulabelle indeed, in his “Campaign and Battle of Waterloo,”
published at Paris in 1845, attributes the non-arrival of Napoleon
at Brussels, to his having calculated that the Prussians would not
assemble in any great force until the 17th, (page 53;) and further on
(page 54,) the author says, “Napoleon’s plans and arrangements were
frustrated and his sanguine expectations disappointed, on finding a
barrier of ninety-five thousand Prussians assembled between him and
the Belgian capital.” The above author also informs us, (page 68,)
that a longer delay on the 16th, in executing his projected movements
at Ligny, would have compromised his success on that day; and (page
95,) that “on the 17th, fresh delays succeeded those of the two
preceding ones.” Ney’s troops, although the marshal, it is pretended,
received orders to renew the attack on Quatre-Bras at break of day,
were still in bivac at eleven o’clock. We are given to understand by
M. de Vaulabelle, that similar delays occurred to different corps
placed under the direct command of the Emperor and marshal Grouchy.
We are also told that “the soldiers grumbled at this inaction of
which they did not know the motives, questioned their officers, and
interrogated their generals;” in fact, to use the author’s words,
“_L’énergie et l’activité semblaient s’être réfugiées dans leurs
rangs_.” (“All energy and activity seemed to have taken refuge in
their ranks.”) The inhabitants of St.-Amand also affirm that, on a
group of generals passing through the village, the soldiers followed
them with their cries, “We made our soup at break of day in order to
be sooner at the ball, and we have been four hours doing nothing; why
don’t we fight? There is something underhand[85].”
In face of all these discrepant statements, and upon calm reflection
and close examination of the history of the battle of Waterloo,
Napoleon’s disasters should not be attributed to the neglect
or disobedience of his generals, but, under Providence, to the
consummate bravery of the troops, and the skill of the generals
opposed to him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account