A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815Cotton, Edward
History
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815
Cotton, Edward
Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
“At the close of the battle of Waterloo, and after the unsuccessful
charge of the French, the English cavalry which charged in return,
approached within two or three hundred yards of the spot where
Napoleon was, with none about him but Soult, Drouot, Bertrand, and
Gourgaud himself. At a short distance from them was a small French
battalion, that had formed square. Napoleon directed general Gourgaud
to order two or three field-pieces belonging to this battalion to be
fired, in order to arrest the cavalry which was coming on. The order
was executed, and one of the balls wounded lord Uxbridge in the leg.
Napoleon put himself at the head of the column, exclaiming, ‘Here we
must die! we must die on the field of battle!’”
Let us observe, that Napoleon must, at this moment, have felt himself
beaten, and that his conquerors were the British, to whom, as the
most noble of his enemies, he paid the compliment, wishing to die by
our hands rather than by those of the Prussians, who were advancing
on his right, ready enough to gratify his wish. But, to continue
general Gourgaud’s account:
“At the very instant that Napoleon was desirous of making a charge
with the handful of men left about him, the English light infantry
was gaining ground. Labédoyère galloped round them, sword in hand,
seeming to court a glorious death on the field of honour. We
prevented Napoleon from rushing into the midst of the enemy. It was
Soult who seized his horse by the bridle, and said, ‘They will not
kill you: you will be taken prisoner;’ and that general, with the
assistance of a few others who gathered round, prevailed on Napoleon
to fly from the field of battle.”
We have often, throughout this discussion, quoted several of our
opponents: let us now give two great authorities on every question
connected with the field of Waterloo, viz. the duke of Wellington and
lord Hill. It is also a conversation, but related by B. R. Haydon
Esq., (_United Service Magazine_, February 1844, page 281:)
“When sir Walter Scott was at Paris in 1815, he was permitted to
ask, and he did put the following questions, at his Grace’s table,
relating to Waterloo, and I repeat them as sir Walter detailed
them to me at my own: ‘Suppose, your Grace, Blücher had not come
up.’ The Duke replied, ‘I could have kept my ground till next
morning.’—‘Suppose Grouchy had come first.’—‘Blücher would have been
close behind him.’—‘But let us suppose, your Grace had been compelled
to retreat.’—‘I could have taken position in the forest of Soigne,
and defied all till the allies joined.’—‘Was there any part of the
day when your Grace despaired?’—‘Never,’ was the reply.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account