A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815Cotton, Edward
History
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815
Cotton, Edward
Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
and at length the retrograde movement became general.
“Then the allied dragoons, who had been judiciously kept in readiness
to act at the favourable moment, darted forward to complete the
disorganization of the now receding waves of the French cavalry.”
[Illustration: (end of chapter; decorative separator)]
FOOTNOTES:
[42] Our advanced posts of Hougoumont, La Haye-Sainte, and Papelotte,
were of the utmost importance to us, more particularly the former.
An eminent military writer (Jomini) says, “Posts that can be readily
defended, are of greater value in battle than insurmountable
obstacles; since it is sufficient if such posts can be maintained
for a few hours by means of mere detachments. Hougoumont with its
enclosures, the farm of La Haye-Sainte and the rivulet of Papelotte,
presented more serious impediments to Ney, than did the celebrated
position of Elchingen.”
[43] General Grant had three horses shot under him.
[44] This might be attributed to many of our infantry, when hard
pressed, adopting the French skirmisher’s method of loading, viz.
after priming, shaking the rest of the powder into the barrel,
dropping the ball after it, and then giving the butt a rap or two
on the ground, which, from the rain, was quite soft. The ball, in
consequence, not being rammed down to confine the powder, came out at
times nearly harmless.
[45] That his Grace ever threw himself into a square, is untrue;
but, from the commencement of the battle till the close, he was
more exposed than many of his troops: whenever there was a chance
of rendering service, let the danger be what it would, the Duke was
there, and, as on all occasions, showed the most perfect coolness and
self-possession.
CHAPTER V.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account