A. W. Kinglake: A Biographical and Literary StudyTuckwell, William
General
A. W. Kinglake: A Biographical and Literary Study
Tuckwell, William
Kinglake, Alexander William, 1809-1891
{12a} “Eothen,” p. 33. Reading “Timbuctoo” to-day one is amazed it
should have gained the prize. Two short passages adumbrate the coming
Tennyson, the rest is mystic nonsense. “What do you think of Tennyson’s
prize poem?” writes Charles Wordsworth to his brother Christopher. “Had
it been sent up at Oxford, the author would have had a better chance of
spending a few months at a lunatic asylum than of obtaining the Prize.”
A current Cambridge story at the time explained the selection. There
were three examiners, the Vice-Chancellor, a man of arbitrary temper,
with whom his juniors hesitated to disagree; a classical professor
unversed in English Literature; a mathematical professor indifferent to
all literature. The letter _g_ was to signify approval, the letter _b_
to brand it with rejection. Tennyson’s manuscript came from the
Vice-Chancellor scored all over with _g_’s. The classical professor
failed to see its merit, but bowed to the Vice-Chancellor, and added his
_g_. The mathematical professor could not admire, but since both his
colleagues ordained it, good it must be, and his _g_ made the award
unanimous. The three met soon after, and the Vice-Chancellor, in his
blatant way, attacked the other two for admiring a trashy poem. “Why,”
they remonstrated, “you covered it with _g_’s yourself.” “_G_’s,” said
he, “they were _q_’s for queries; I could not understand a line of it.”
{12b} “Enoch Arden,” p. 34.
{13} “Eothen,” p. 169. Reprint by Bell and Sons, 1898.
{14a} “Eothen,” p. 17.
{14b} His deferential regard for army rank was like that of Johnson for
bishops. Great was his indignation when the “grotesque Salvation Army,”
as he called it, adopted military nomenclature. “I would let those
ragamuffins call themselves saints, angels, prophets, cherubim, Olympian
gods and goddesses if they like; but their pretension in taking the rank
of officers in the army is to me beyond measure repulsive.”
{14c} “Eothen,” p. 190 in first edition. It was struck out in the
fourth edition.
{22} “Eothen,” p. 18. Reprint by Bell and Sons, 1898.
{28} He is very fond of this word; it occurs eleven times.
{37} “Quarterly Review,” December, 1844.
{38a} “Eothen,” p. 46.
{38b} Poitier’s “Vaudeville.”
{40} One characteristic anecdote he omits. Two French officers were
attached to our headquarters; and the staff were partly embarrassed and
partly amused by Lord Raglan’s inveterate habit, due to old Peninsular
associations, of calling the enemy “the French” in the presence of our
foreign guests.
{47} Some of us can recall the lines in which Sir G. Trevelyan
commemorated “The Owl’s” nocturnal flights:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account