Russia -- History -- Revolution, 1905-1907; Russia -- Politics and government -- 1894-1917; Russia -- Social conditions -- 1801-1917
I have talked with several Conservatives lately—not Moderate Liberals,
but Conservatives of the old _régime_—and their indignation against the
Government was extreme. One of them said that the formation of a
Ministry from the majority of the Duma, namely, the Cadets, with whom he
had no sympathy, was the only chance of saving the situation; that he
could understand the policy of dissolution; but the Government did
neither the one nor the other, and the people who were paying for this
mistake were the landlords with the destruction and devastation of their
property. Another said to me that there were at present two great
dangerous elements in Russia—the revolutionaries and the Government—and
that of the two the Government was the more dangerous. A third, a large
landed proprietor, said that he preferred to be despoiled by
expropriation rather than to have all his estates devastated and his
houses burnt. A Government taken from the majority of the Duma, he
added, was the only solution, but it should have been done two months
ago; now it was too late. I mentioned the dissolution of the Duma and
the possibility of a dictatorship. “You would want five hundred
dictators, not one,” he answered, “and what is the use of a dictatorship
when the whole country is on fire? The action of the Government has been
like this: it is as if some people had set a town on fire, locked up the
fire engines, and then talked of putting a dictator at the head of the
fire brigade.”
In opposition to this I have heard views expressed which perhaps reflect
those of the Government. One man said to me that it was now obvious that
the Duma, instead of having a pacifying influence, was merely a cause of
disorder; that when it was originally convened he had believed in its
pacifying capacities; but now he was convinced of the contrary, and the
sooner it was dissolved the better. It may be objected that, though it
is after all true that the convening of the Duma did not pacify the
country, it is necessary to reflect under what conditions it was
convened: its hands were tied; the fundamental laws were altered for
this purpose; the Government not only went on governing as before, but
actually took active measures to discredit its new Parliament at home
and abroad. When a Duma was asked for, the thing meant was Responsible
Government. It is over this question of responsibility that the whole
struggle is being carried on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account