Russia -- History -- Revolution, 1905-1907; Russia -- Politics and government -- 1894-1917; Russia -- Social conditions -- 1801-1917
Among other constitutional matters there is one lesson which they have
not learnt, and probably never will learn, and that is that if you have
a Parliamentary system you must put up with the fact that it will often
return a majority which is distasteful to you. If the elections are
carried out fairly it can safely be predicted that the majority returned
will be ultra-Radical. But I suppose this time those steps will be taken
which the present Ministry so bitterly accuse Count Witte of having
omitted to take, the steps to “arrange” the elections, which, we are
told (several officials told me personally), the Government always take
in England. That is to say, Mr. Balfour and Lord Lansdowne, it is
thought, take the necessary steps to prevent the election of Mr. Keir
Hardie and his supporters. It is strange that so far this plan should
have proved unsuccessful. It would be, perhaps, simpler here to pass an
electoral law in virtue of which only policemen could be elected members
of Parliament. This would prove a constitutional measure which the
present Ministry would thoroughly understand.
One sometimes hears it said that the Duma was in too great a hurry, and
that it should have waited patiently and obtained everything by
constitutional means. This was the course the majority were doing their
best to pursue. They had to reckon with a Government which was opposing
them by unconstitutional means. It is certainly not constitutional for a
Government to distribute among the troops proclamations (I have seen
them) inciting the Army against the Parliament, and attacking members of
Parliament with every kind of gross insult and calumny. Nor is it
constitutional for a Minister to request the correspondent of a large
foreign newspaper to state that the Parliament is not a thing to be
reckoned with, but merely a revolutionary body. The answer people made
to these objections is that there is not, and there never has been, a
constitution in Russia, and they are perfectly right.
But, apart from this, I agree with the Russian landlord I have quoted
above, who said that the main question must be decided before one can
talk of a Parliament here. The abscess must be pierced to the core, he
said. It was a pleasing illusion to think the Cadets would obtain a
change of _régime_ by constitutional means. “You must wait, little
pigeon, you must wait,” says a character in a novel by a famous Russian
satirist. “I have done nothing else during my whole life,” is the reply.
And if the Parliament had waited until the Government became
constitutional it could have waited until Doomsday, because, as another
Russian said to me not long ago, “it has less idea of what
_constitutional_ means than the Turks, only the Turks are more competent
and are better governed.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account