Russia -- History -- Revolution, 1905-1907; Russia -- Politics and government -- 1894-1917; Russia -- Social conditions -- 1801-1917
The young Cossack officer did not bother to discuss the question. He
went out into the night in disgust. We continued the argument for a
short time. “There is not a single character,” said the doctor, “in all
Dostoievski’s books who is normal.” The doctor was a cultivated man, and
seeing that we differed we agreed to differ, and we talked of other
things, but I was left wondering why Hliebnikov was so convinced that
Dostoievski was the greatest of all writers, and why he knew I should
agree with him. I have been thinking this over ever since, and in a
sense I do agree with Hliebnikov. I think that Dostoievski is the
greatest writer that has ever lived, if by a great writer is meant a man
whose work, message, or whatever you like to call it, can do the
greatest good, can afford the greatest consolation to poor humanity. If
we mean by the greatest writer the greatest artist, the most powerful
magician, who can bid us soar like Shelley or Schubert into the seventh
heaven of melody, or submerge us like Wagner beneath heavy seas until we
drown with pleasure, or touch and set all the fibres of our associations
and our æsthetic appreciation vibrating with incommunicable rapture by
the magic of wonderful phrases like Virgil or Keats, or strike into our
very heart with a divine sword like Sappho, Catullus, Heine, or Burns,
or ravish us by the blend of pathos and nobility of purpose with
faultless diction like Leopardi, Gray, and Racine, or bid us understand
and feel the whole burden of mankind in a thin thread of notes like
Beethoven or in a few simple words like Goethe, or evoke for us the
whole pageant of life like Shakespeare to the sound of Renaissance
flutes, or all Heaven and Hell like Dante, by “thoughts that breathe and
words that burn”?
If we are thinking of all these miraculous achievements when we say a
great writer or the greatest writer, then we must not name Dostoievski.
Dostoievski is not of these; in his own province, that of the novelist,
he is as a mere workman, a mere craftsman, one of the worst, inferior to
any French or English ephemeral writer of the day you like to mention;
but, on the other hand, if we mean by a great writer a man who has given
to mankind an inestimable boon, a priceless gift, a consolation, a help
to life, which nothing can equal or replace, then Dostoievski is a great
writer, and perhaps the greatest writer that has ever lived. I mean that
if the Holy Scriptures were destroyed and no trace were left of them in
the world, the books where mankind, bereft of its Divine and inestimable
treasure, would find the nearest approach to the supreme message of
comfort would be the books of Dostoievski.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account