A year of prophesyingWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A year of prophesying
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Civilization, Modern -- 20th century; Europe -- History -- 20th century; Great Britain -- History -- 20th century
It was Marx who created modern Communism. It is the sterile mule of
Socialism and a scientific ambition. Socialism from the days of Robert
Owen onward was a thing of schemes and projects. It was perpetually
seeking better arrangements. Its methods were Utopian. But Marx
was bitten by an ambition to rival Darwin; he was to be the Darwin
of social and political science, with none of Darwin’s modesty or
Darwin’s intellectual patience. He had the mind of a theologian with
the pretension of a scientific inquirer, and he had the dull man’s
hatred and contempt for the human imagination. His movement was to
be “scientific” with all the magic that word carried half a century
ago. There was to be nothing imaginative and no confounded ideals.
It was all to be fatalistic. It was never going to plan what would
happen because it was going to know what would happen. He and his
associates produced a very sound and ample analysis of the processes
of decay in the business life of the time, but with such ambitions
and such repudiations they could produce no scheme of any replacement
system. They have no scheme to this day. Even Russia has not taught the
Communist the practical need of Utopias.
At a certain level of intelligence party Communism is a very attractive
teaching indeed. Its self-assurance is very reassuring. Any human being
not absolutely stupid hates to be robbed of freedom and educational
opportunity before thirteen or fourteen and thrust into uncongenial
and hopeless toil. Most employment is bitter for young people. At the
same time people whose education is truncated so soon usually fail to
develop sufficient intellectual power to understand complex industrial
and financial processes. They develop an inferiority complex about such
things that clamours in them for comfort.
Communism embodies that hate and provides that comfort. It points
to the “Capitalist” as the oppressor and claims to furnish in a few
phrases all that needs to be known. In a social system that educated
everyone to sixteen or eighteen and then gave a fair wide choice of
public service there would be none of that hate and that defensive
aggressiveness, that suppressed suspicion of ignorance and inefficiency
that makes Communist controversy so loud and rude, which has made
Mr. Trotsky so loud and rude. The marshes in which the cantankerous
spirit of Communism grows would be drained and evaporated. By the
theory of Marx it was in the highly developed industrial system of
Western Europe, and particularly in Great Britain, that the Communist
Revolution would first occur. The disconcerting fact for Communists is
that it occurred in Russia, where the industrial organisation was at
a low level and there were eighty per cent. of illiterates. In Great
Britain nobody except the enterprising people who want to raise money
from imbecile dukes and rich old ladies even pretends to be afraid of a
Communist Revolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account