A year of prophesyingWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A year of prophesying
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Civilization, Modern -- 20th century; Europe -- History -- 20th century; Great Britain -- History -- 20th century
Or secondly, the prophets think that Labour may produce very bold and
far-reaching Socialist proposals. They may stick to the Capital Levy,
and so forth. They may put up their entire election programme. Then the
Liberal Party will withdraw its support. Mr. Ramsay MacDonald will be
obliged to resign, and the clever little, brave little Liberal group
will form a Government, and with the assistance of a large part of the
Conservatives carry on and--with large benevolent gestures--“save the
country” by doing nothing. So that on the second alternative also the
Liberal Party stands to win.
But then Mr. Ramsay MacDonald may advise the King to dissolve
Parliament; he may ask the country to decide upon his Budget and
legislative programme. And here comes the most delicate issue of all.
The Liberal prophets tell us the King will refuse a dissolution. Will
he in fact refuse to follow the advice of his Ministers, and become
active instead of passive in party affairs? When Mr. Baldwin asked
for a dissolution the King protested and granted it. Will he behave
differently towards Mr. MacDonald? The Liberal prophets have most
attractive arguments to show that such a course is constitutional.
No doubt it is. Mr. Baldwin had a majority; Mr. MacDonald has not.
Nevertheless, would such a refusal, from the point of view of the
Court, be a wise thing? The common man in the country is not going to
see the thing from the lawyer’s standpoint. He is going to conclude
that the King favours the Conservatives and Liberals against Labour.
From the point of view of the monarchy that is a very undesirable
conclusion, even if it is an unjust conclusion, to spread about the
country in a period of unemployment and social stress.
It is a polite convention in Great Britain that there is no Republican
feeling in the land. That convention is not in accordance with the
facts. There is much dormant Republicanism, but so long as the monarchy
remains “the golden link of empire,” so long as the conditions of a
“crowned republic” are observed, Republicanism sleeps. But it sleeps
much more lightly than many people suppose, and the crown cannot afford
to make mistakes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account