Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
The gentleman from Connecticut, with a prudence and consistency highly
becoming, wishes time to think on the subject. But how is that gentleman
to have foundation for his reflections until a bill is drawn? Mr. S. did
not know what were the resources of that gentleman's mind, but for
himself, he must own that in all the attitudes in which this subject
had presented itself, he could not distinctly see the plan. One
gentleman had said there was no remedy the United States could apply but
what was incompatible with the laws of the individual States. Mr. S.
presumed that until he saw the mode to be adopted, he could not say
whether it was easy or difficult. On the whole, he thought to postpone
the subject could answer no good end, while it might delay the object,
and do injury.
Mr. COIT said, very probably the resources of his mind may not be equal
to that gentleman's, he therefore wished the subject to be delayed that
he might have time to get into the knowledge of the business.
Mr. COIT'S motion for postponement was then put and carried--yeas 46,
nays 30.
_Hugh Lawson White._
Mr. BLOUNT then called for the order of the day on the report of the
Secretary of War on the petition of Hugh Lawson White, a soldier under
General Sevier, against the Indians. The House accordingly resolved
itself into a Committee of the Whole.
The following report from the Committee of Claims was then read:
That the claim set forth in the said petition, is intended
to establish a principle that will apply to the whole of
the militia which were called out under Brigadier General
Sevier, in 1793, to act offensively against certain Indians
south-west of the Ohio.
That the expedition against these Indians, as appears from
the muster-rolls, comprehended a period of above five
months, or from the 22d July to 31st December, 1793.
That it was undertaken without authority derived from the
President, under the laws of the United States, and for the
avowed purpose of carrying the war into the Cherokee
country.
That the tenor of the instructions from the Department of
War to the Governor of the South-western Territory forbade
offensive operations.
Having given these facts, it may be proper to add, that it
appears, by a recurrence to official papers, that the
Indians had greatly perplexed and harassed by thefts and
murders, the frontier inhabitants of Tennessee; and
previous to the service, for which compensation is
demanded, had shown themselves in considerable force, and
killed at two stations (one of them within seven miles of
Knoxville) fifteen persons, including women and children:
that it must rest with Congress to judge how far these
aggressions of Indians, and such other circumstances as can
be adduced to the parties, constitute a case of imminent
danger, or the expedition a just and necessary measure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account