Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
"_Resolved_, That the injunction of secrecy upon the
members of this House, so far as it relates to that part of
the communication made by the President, by his Message of
January 9, which has been printed, be taken off, and that
all future debates and proceedings thereon be had with open
doors."
A motion was made to insert, after the words "be taken off," "together
with the letter of Messrs. Barlow and Donaldson, of April 5, 1796." The
question on the amendment was taken by yeas and nays, and lost--yeas 19,
nays 65.
The main question was then taken by yeas and nays, and resulted--yeas
53, nays 36.
Reports of the Secretary of State, relative to the present
situation of affairs with the Dey and Regency of Algiers,
accompanying the following confidential Message from the
President of the United States, received the 9th of
January, 1797:
_Gentlemen of the Senate, and of the House of
Representatives_:
Herewith I lay before you, in confidence, reports from the
Departments of State and the Treasury, by which you will
see the present situation of our affairs with the Dey and
Regency of Algiers.
G. WASHINGTON.
UNITED STATES, January 9, 1797.
_To the President of the United States, the Secretary of
State respectfully makes the following brief representation
of the affairs of the United States, in relation to
Algiers_:
When Colonel Humphreys left America, in April, 1795, he was
accompanied by Joseph Donaldson, Esq., who had been
appointed Consul for Tunis and Tripoli; and him Colonel
Humphreys was authorized to employ in negotiating a Treaty
with Algiers, while he should proceed himself to France,
for the purpose of obtaining the co-operation of that
Government in this negotiation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account