Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
Mr. W. SMITH said, he should not adduce many arguments to show the
propriety of advancing the duty upon this article any more than that
upon any other; but he wished to bring before the committee a true
statement of the receipts and expenditures of the United States, in
order to show what sum of money would probably be wanted to answer the
demands of the United States. As he differed considerably from the
gentleman from Pennsylvania as to our real wants, he considered it as
his duty to lay this statement before the committee. He had investigated
the subject with as much accuracy as possible. He had attended to the
documents which had been laid before them, to the laws which would
probably pass this session, and to the probable increase of revenue. The
result of this examination was, that there would be a deficiency of
about a million of dollars. To what the additional imposts already
agreed to would amount, he could not say, but he believed they would
make 200,000 dollars, which would leave a deficiency of 800,000 dollars.
He made the following statement:
_Expenses of 1797._
Civil list, $634,322
Military and Naval Establishment and pensions, 1,284,532
Deficiency of 1796, 201,000
Algerine appropriation, 376,500
Interest of Domestic Debt, 3,471,972
Interest on Dutch debt, 614,241
Instalments do do. 1797, 400,000
Premium remitt. &c. 50,000
Appropriations for frigate, 171,000
---------
7,213,567
=========
_Revenues of 1797._
Impost, $5,588,961
Internal revenues, 337,255
Post Office, 35,000
Bank stock, 150,000
Stock redeemed, 88,636
Sundries, 746
---------
6,200,598
Additional imposts in 1797, 200,000
---------
6,400,598
Probable deficiency of revenue, 812,969
---------
7,213,567
=========
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account