Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
The expenses of the Quartermaster's Department would in future be
considerably lessened; for, said Mr. S., heretofore great expense had
been incurred by land carriage, which in future would be avoided, as the
forage would all be conveyed by water. Indeed it had not been an unusual
thing for the horses employed in conveying forage from one post to
another, to eat the whole of it in their journey to and from their
destination, and some horses had been known to die from want on the
road. The conveyance being now by water, a great destruction of horses
would be prevented, and he doubted not that one hundred thousand dollars
would be saved under this head.
FRIDAY, February 24.
_Amy Dardin._
The House proceeded to consider the report of the Committee of Claims,
of the sixth ultimo, to whom was referred the petition of Amy Dardin,
which lay on the table; whereupon, the said report was read at the
Clerk's table, in the words following, to wit:
"That the most important, and all the material facts
respecting this claim, are stated in the former report of
the committee appointed to consider the said petition. To
that report the committee now ask leave to refer. Whatever
justice there might originally have been in this claim
against the United States, it is now, and for many years
past has been, as clearly within the statutes of
limitation, as a multitude of others, which have been
rejected. The committee regret that no relief can, with
propriety, be granted to the petitioner, upon her
application. So many evils would result from a suspension
of the limitation act, for the admission of claims similar
to the one under consideration, the committee cannot
recommend that measure to be adopted. They are of opinion
the prayer of the petition ought not to be granted."
The question was taken that the House do agree to the said report, and
passed in the negative--34 to 27; when Mr. GALLATIN moved that a
committee be appointed to bring in a bill in favor of the petitioner.
This motion occasioned some debate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account