“And Carter’s Ferry on James river, Cole’s Ferry on Stanton, Dansville on Dan river, in Virginia; Salisbury, Beatty’s Ford, on Catawba, in North Carolina; Spartanburg, Greenville Courthouse, and Pendleton Courthouse, in South Carolina; and Jackson Courthouse in Georgia:” His object being to designate the intermediate points of the route between the seat of Government and New Orleans and Natchez. This motion was supported by Messrs. STANFORD, J. RANDOLPH, EARLY, EARLE, and MACON, on the principle that it was proper that Congress should designate the route, and on the ground that the route contemplated by the amendment would be the fittest. On the other hand, the motion was opposed by Messrs. THOMAS, SMILIE, HOLLAND, CLAIBORNE, S. L. MITCHILL, and G. W. CAMPBELL, on the ground that a discretionary power should be reposed in the Postmaster General to designate the route; and on the ground that, if Congress should undertake to designate the route, the one fixed by the amendment was not an eligible one. Mr. DENNIS declared himself in favor of the House exercising the power of designating the route, but was not sufficiently informed to vote on any particular line. Mr. R. GRISWOLD moved that the Committee of the Whole should rise and ask leave to sit again, with the view that leave should be refused, and the report recommitted to the Post Office Committee, in order to obtain from them a detailed report, that would furnish the House with satisfactory information. This motion was supported by Mr. GREGG, and opposed by Mr. THOMAS, and carried--yeas 70. The House then refused leave to the Committee of the Whole to sit again--yeas 19, and recommitted the report to the Post Office Committee. FRIDAY, December 30. Three other members, to wit: EBENEZER ELMER, JOHN SLOAN, and HENRY SOUTHARD, from New Jersey, appeared, produced their credentials, were qualified, and took their seats in the House. TUESDAY, January 3, 1804. _Light-House Duties._ Mr. MITCHILL observed, that there had been some conversation in the House during the last session, concerning the sums of money paid by our merchants on foreign voyages. He wished to renew that subject, as well worthy of the attention of Government. Foreign nations levy money upon our vessels, which frequent their ports, for the purpose of supporting their light-houses. The sums paid by our merchants in compliance with these exactions are very considerable. The contribution which strangers are thus obliged to make, constitutes a fund, that goes a great way towards defraying the expense of those establishments, to the great relief of their own subjects.