Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
Another member, to wit, WILLIAM HELMS, from New Jersey, appeared,
produced his credentials, was qualified, and took his seat in the House.
WEDNESDAY, January 11.
_Virginia Yazoo Company._
On a motion made and seconded,
“That the agent or agents of the Virginia Yazoo Company,
‘claimants of compensation under the late cession and
convention between the State of Georgia and the United States,
and the acts lately passed by Congress thereon, as purchasers
of land in the Mississippi Territory, in the year one thousand
seven hundred and eighty-nine, from the said State of Georgia,’
be heard in person, or by counsel, at the bar of the House, on
Monday next:”
The question was taken thereupon, and resolved in the affirmative--yeas
61, nays 49.
On a motion made and seconded that the House do come to the following
resolution:
_Resolved_, That the South Carolina Yazoo Company be heard by
their agent, on Monday next, at the bar of the House:
And the said motion being twice read at the Clerk’s table, a motion was
made and seconded to amend the same, by striking out all the words from
the word “Resolved,” in the first line, to the end of the motion, and
inserting, in lieu thereof, the following words: “That this House will,
on Monday next, hear all the agents of the different companies claiming
lands south of the State of Tennessee, who may choose to speak at the bar
of this House.”
And on the question that the House do agree to the said amendment, it
passed in the negative. And the main question being taken that the House
do agree to the said motion, as originally proposed, it was resolved in
the affirmative--yeas 67, nays 46.
FRIDAY, February 3.
_Georgia Militia Claims._
The House went into Committee of the Whole on the report of the Committee
of Claims, on the petition of John M. Randolph and Randolph McGillis,
which is unfavorable to the prayer of the petitioners.
The petitioners claim their pay as militiamen, called out in the State
of Georgia for the protection of that State against the Indians. They
allege, that, being called out under the authority of the Government of
the United States, the General Government is bound to compensate them and
the other men called out for their services.
The Committee of Claims report that the petitioners are to look for
compensation to the State of Georgia, who, by the articles of cession
recently concluded, had agreed to receive one million two hundred and
fifty thousand dollars, in full for all demands for military service.
[This debate, though nominally on a private claim, retains a
surviving interest from its historic details, its connection
with the Georgia cession, its references to the Yazoo
speculation, and its dependence upon the question of protection
between the Federal Government and a State.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account