Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
And a division was called for, and that the question be taken on the
first proposition, ending with the words, “sue for the same:” and, on the
question to agree to this first division of the amendment, it passed in
the affirmative--yeas 21, nays 7, as follows:
YEAS.--Messrs. Anderson, Armstrong, Bradley, Breckenridge,
Brown, Cocke, Franklin, Hillhouse, Logan, Maclay, Nicholas,
Olcott, Pickering, Plumer, Potter, I. Smith, John Smith,
Venable, Wells, White, and Worthington.
NAYS.--Messrs. Adams, Baldwin, Condit, Dayton, Ellery, Jackson,
and Samuel Smith.
A motion was made to strike out all that follows the word “and,” in the
second division of the amendment, for the purpose of a further amendment;
and after debate, the consideration of the subject was postponed.
TUESDAY, January 31.
_Erection of Louisiana into two Territories._
The Senate resumed the second reading of the bill erecting Louisiana into
two Territories, and providing for the temporary government thereof;
and a motion was made to strike out the last division of the amendment
proposed yesterday, to wit:
“And no slave or slaves shall, directly or indirectly, be
introduced into said Territory except by a person or persons
removing into said Territory for actual settlement, and being,
at the time of such removal, _bona fide_ owner of such slave
or slaves; and every slave imported or brought into the said
Territory, contrary to the provisions of this act, shall,
thereupon, be entitled to, and receive, his or her freedom;”
and to insert the following:
“No slave shall be admitted into the said Territory from the
United States or their Territories, who shall not be the
property of some person _bona fide_ removing from the United
States into the said Territory, and making an actual settlement
therein, or who shall not have passed by descent or devise to
the person or persons claiming the same, and residing within
the said Territory, from some person or persons deceased in
some one of the United States or their Territories; and every
slave who shall be brought into said Territory, otherwise than
is hereby permitted, shall be forfeited, and may be recovered
by any person who shall sue for the same; and the person or
persons offending herein shall moreover forfeit and pay ----
dollars for every slave so brought in, to be recovered by
action of debt in any court having jurisdiction thereof; one
moiety to the use of the United States, and the other moiety to
the use of the person who shall sue for the same. And in any
action instituted for the recovery of the penalty aforesaid,
the person or persons sued may be held to special bail:”
And a division on the question was called for, and that it be taken on
striking out; and, on the question, Shall the words be stricken out? it
passed in the negative--yeas 13, nays 15, as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account