The Senate resumed the third reading of the bill, entitled “An act to alter and establish certain post roads.” On motion, to add the following after section third: “_And be it further enacted_, That two post roads shall be laid out, under the inspection of commissioners to be appointed by the President of the United States, one to lead from Tellico block-house, in the State of Tennessee, and the other from Jackson court-house, in the State of Georgia, by routes the most eligible, and as nearly direct as the nature of the ground will admit, to New Orleans.” It passed in the affirmative--yeas 17, nays 10, as follows: YEAS.--Messrs. Anderson, Armstrong, Baldwin, Breckenridge, Cocke, Dayton, Franklin, Jackson, Maclay, Nicholas, John Smith of Ohio, John Smith of New York, Samuel Smith, Stone, Sumter, Venable, and Worthington. NAYS.--Messrs. Adams, Bradley, Hillhouse, Logan, Olcott, Pickering, Plumer, Israel Smith, Tracy, and White. And, sundry other amendments having been agreed to, _Resolved_, That this bill do pass as amended. _Seat of Government._ The bill for the temporary removal of the seat of Government of the United States to the city of Baltimore was taken up for its second reading. [The debate which took place on this occasion, had progressed to some length before the reporter entered the House. Mr. WRIGHT was then on the floor, and had made a motion to postpone the further consideration of the bill until the first Monday in May.] Mr. W. assigned as reasons for this motion, that it was not his intention in presenting the bill, that it should pass; but that it had been offered with the view of acting as a spur to the inhabitants of Washington to effect a more complete accommodation of Congress. He trusted and believed it would have that effect; and the operation of the postponement would, by hanging the bill over their heads, most powerfully tend to produce the desirable result of a concentration of the city, and an augmentation of accommodation. Mr. JACKSON followed, and, in terms of appropriate energy, condemned the proposition of removal. He said he should not have believed, but for the express declaration of the gentleman from Maryland, that he would have brought forward a bill the sole object of which was to frighten the women and children of Washington. So far from the measure having the desired effect avowed by the gentleman, if it had any effect whatever, it would be to shake all confidence in the Government, to repress the very accommodation desired. Mr. J. denied the moral right of Congress to remove the seat of Government; it had been fixed under the constitution, and without its violation could not be changed. Such a measure would indicate a prostration of plighted faith; would destroy all confidence in the Government, from one end of the continent to the other.