Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 3 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
Now then, after this uniform opinion, entertained by Congress, by the
States of Maryland and Virginia, and by every man who has expressed an
opinion on the subject, until within a few years past, are we to be told
that it is possible to give a different construction to the constitution?
If any thing can fix a meaning to words, every thing which has occurred
to this day, unites to decide this the permanent seat of the Government.
These, said Mr. A., are my ideas. On the ground of expediency, if it were
admitted as applicable to the present question, I would not undertake
to say whether this is the most proper place for the residence of the
Government. Nor will I say that Congress could not, consistently, remove
in consequence of an act of God; that implies force, to which all human
institutions must give way. But, say gentlemen, if we remove, we must
indemnify the proprietors. But why indemnify if the constitution does not
make this the permanent seat of Government, as it has been understood to
be by every body until this day? Where is the propriety of indemnifying
the holders of property here, if this is not the permanent seat, more
than proprietors in Philadelphia or New York, where Congress formerly
met? This very argument, urged by the advocates of the bill, shows that
the constitution has made this the permanent seat. As to the idea of
some gentlemen, of granting millions for an indemnity, the thing is
impossible; it cannot be done; the people will not suffer it.
Mr. DAYTON replied to some of the remarks made in the course of
the debate, principally for the purpose of explaining his previous
observations.
When the question was taken, on ordering the bill to a third reading, and
passed in the negative--yeas 9, nays 19, as follows:
YEAS.--Messrs. Anderson, Armstrong, Breckenridge, Bradley,
Maclay, Plumer, Stone, Tracy, and Worthington.
NAYS.--Messrs. Adams, Baldwin, Cocke, Dayton, Franklin,
Hillhouse, Jackson, Logan, Nicholas, Olcott, Pickering, I.
Smith, S. Smith, J. Smith of Ohio, J. Smith of New York,
Sumter, Venable, White, and Wright.
So the bill was lost.
TUESDAY, March 20.
_Wreck and Capture of the Frigate Philadelphia._
The following Message was received from the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES:
_To the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States_:
I communicate to Congress a letter from Captain Bainbridge,
commander of the Philadelphia frigate, informing us of the
wreck of that vessel on the coast of Tripoli, and that himself,
his officers, and men, had fallen into the hands of the
Tripolitans. This accident renders it expedient to increase
our force and enlarge our expenses in the Mediterranean
beyond what the last appropriation contemplated. I recommend,
therefore, to the consideration of Congress, such an addition
to that appropriation as they may think the exigency requires.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account