Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
Our religious natures are still Ptolemaic. The heavens still revolve
around us. We do not with the eye of the flesh see ourselves in this
world as on a sphere--on a celestial body floating in space; we see
ourselves as on an endless plain over and under which the heavenly
bodies pass. It is only with the eye of the mind that we see things
in their true relation and see that there is no up and no down, no
under and no over, apart from the earth, and no God who rules as
a ruler rules. We do not gain the tremendous facts of astronomy
through our everyday experience; our search after scientific truth
reveals them to us. Through this inquiry we see the grand voyage we
are making among the stars, and see that the heavens are not a realm
apart from us, the abode of superior beings, but are our veritable
habitat; that our earth is a celestial body among myriads of others,
and that when we solemnly lift our eyes heavenward, we are lifting
them to other worlds made of the same stuff as our own. Our religious
emotions and aspirations lead us to look away from the earth and
to imagine finer and fairer realms, but disinterested science does
not humor our illusions; it brings us back to earth again, back
to the heaven we despise. Hence the trouble the narrow religious
nature has with science. It experiences a cold shudder before its
revelations and will none of it. It will have beginnings and endings,
boundaries and limitations, heavenly and earthly, and will read the
impersonal laws of the universe in terms of our personal human needs
and relations. It sets up a judge and ruler of creation modeled on
our human plan, and then to get out of the dilemma in which it finds
itself, with all the sin and misery and injustice of the world which
it finds upon its hands, and which omnipotent love and mercy could
never tolerate, dopes itself with theological casuistry that seeks
to justify the ways of God to man. It is a world-old problem. The
only way I see out of it is by purging our minds of the old dogmas
and boldly facing the reality as science shows it to us. Religion
as the world has so long used the term--that human mixture of fear,
reverence, superstition, and selfish desire--has had its day. We
may still marvel and love and admire and rejoice, but let us fear
and plead and tremble no more. There is nothing to be afraid of
worse than ourselves, and nothing to implore and propitiate farther
removed from us than the rain and the sunshine. In the end all things
work together for our good--not always for the good of to-day, or
of to-morrow, or for this man or that man, but for the good of all,
for the good which evolution brings in its train. Evolution brings
what we call evil also, but evil is a term of our human experience,
and the Infinite, the Eternal, knows it not. What is evil to one
creature in the struggle for life we have seen to be good to another,
and often what our religious fears recoil from, science sees as
the beneficent operation of law.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account