Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
“It is no small matter, this round and delicious globe, moving
so exactly in its orbit for ever and ever, without one
jolt, or the untruth of a single second.”
He is filled with “the great thoughts of space and eternity,” and
common things assume new meanings in his eyes:
“I lie abstracted and hear the meanings of things and the
reason of things.
They are so beautiful I nudge myself to listen.”
Who before Whitman ever drew his poetic, his æsthetic, and ethical
standards from the earth, from the sexuality, from the impartiality
of the earth, or his laws for creations from the earth? Only the
wisest readers are prepared for their unliterary flavor:
“I swear there can be no greatness or power that does not
emulate those of the earth.
There can be no theory of any account unless it corroborates
the theory of the earth.
No politics, song, religion, behavior, or what not, is of
account, unless it compare with the amplitude of the earth,
Unless it face the exactness, vitality, impartiality, rectitude
of the earth.”
We all see in Whitman, as we see in Nature, what we bring the means
of seeing. Readers of him are likely to see their own limitations
for the limitations of Whitman. It is as if we thought that the
length of our sounding-line was the measure of the ocean’s depth. It
may be so, but it is not always so. A man of strict moral and ethical
ideas, according to conventional standards, will find Whitman rank
with original sin. Is not Nature rank with the same form of evil?
Whitman did not shrink from natural tests. Naturalism was the essence
of his religion.
“Nothing out of place is good, nothing in its place is bad.”
But the good in Nature is vastly more than the evil, else you and I
would not be here, and the good in Whitman is vastly more than the
evil, or he would have been forgotten long ago.
Evil, as we use the term, attends all great things. Evil--some man’s
evil--comes out of the sunshine, the rains, the protecting snows. One
of our poets objects to Whitman’s saying that evil is just as perfect
as good. Whitman does not say it is just as desirable, but just as
perfect. Are not these things we call evil perfect--snakes, nettles,
thorns, volcanoes, earthquakes? Is not a fungus as perfect as a
rose?--a toad as perfect as a bird? Each obeys its own law. The germs
of typhoid fever and of pneumonia are just as perfect as the germs
that favor us. Whitman said:
“I permit to speak at every hazard Nature without check, with
original energy.”
The hazards are great, but the stakes are great also. Readers who
cannot stand an utterance of this sort should go to Pollock’s “Course
of Time,” or Young’s “Night Thoughts,” or Dr. Holland’s “Bitter
Sweet.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account