Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
Biological laws are as remorseless as physical laws. The course of
animal evolution through the geologic ages is everywhere marked by
the triumph of new and superior forms over the old and inferior
forms. Among the lower races of man, our remote savage ancestors,
might ruled. The strong and prolific tribes supplanted those that
were less so, and, among the nations, up to our own day, the rule of
natural competition, or survival of the fittest, has held full sway.
Those nations which are dominant are so by virtue of their superior
qualities, physical, moral, or intellectual. It is not a question of
might except in so far as this question is linked with the question
of moral and intellectual superiority.
Is there, then, no such thing as equity, justice, fair play in the
world? Shall I seize my neighbor’s farm and despoil him of his goods
and chattels because I am stronger than he? Shall one state invade
and despoil another, or seize its territory, because it is stronger
and considers itself more fit to survive?
The rule of might, as I have said, prevails throughout the world
of matter and of life below man, and long prevailed in pre-human
and human history. But the old law of nature has been limited and
qualified by a new law which has come into the world and which is
just as truly a biological law in its application to man as was the
old law of might. I refer to the law of man’s moral nature, the
source of right, justice, mercy. The progress of the race and of
the nations is coming more and more to depend upon the observance
of this law. Without it there is no organization, no coöperation,
no commerce, no government. Without it anarchy would rule, and our
civilization would crumble and society disintegrate.
The moral sense of mankind is now the dominant fact in human history;
the rule of might has been superseded by the rule of right. It is
this sense in the civilized world that has revolted so overwhelmingly
against the Prussian military power in precipitating the World War;
and this conscience will probably be so developed and intensified by
the useless waste and cruelty of the war that such a calamity will
never again befall the world. Those nations will become the most
powerful that are the most just, the most humane, that develop in the
highest degree a world conscience, and realize the most intensely
that the nations all belong to one family, in which the good and
evil of one are the good and evil of all. What can the progress of
civilization mean but the progress of international comity, sympathy,
coöperation, fair-dealing; in fact, the fullest recognition of
the validity of the ethical laws to which we hold individuals and
communities amenable?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account